the reason i agree is because it is that person's freedom of speech. but at the same exact time, it is kind of like Gina carano. just because you have freedom of speech does not mean that you have freedom of consequences. the impact of a protest kind of goes worse. with the 140 days of black lives matter riots in may-august, it got positive reception. whereas, the one day of capital riots was negatively received. in conclusion, it depends on their political affiliation

i believe that it is not possible to protect the freedom of speech and limit cyber bullying. that is because the internet is slowly becoming more and more like 4Chan. additionally, it really depends on the person and their mental capacity. if they can take a hit online from some trolls and radicals, then it should not be a problem. but in the case of someone that does not have a high mental capacity, then they will not be able to take it and they might do something stupid. in conclusion, if you want to limit cyber bullying and preserve freedom of speech, the people using it online needs to toughen up and deal with the toxic online community.

concerned citizen Micheal Smithson: if the crown wants to protect us, why did they make a proclamation line

concerned citizen Micheal Smithson: do you feel as if the British regulars are treating you well

concerned citizen Micheal Smithson: do you believe that measures can be made to gain your freedoms without inciting violence?

concerned citizen Micheal Smithson: if you decide to rebel against the crown, what will you do next