I agree with this because China has a stable economy and military which could put them in the lead. The United States may have political influence but the might not be enough to stay in the lead.

Source : http://www.indexmundi.com/g/

Economics winner: China

China is the winner in the economy section because compared to the United States, China has made more money as well as keeping the money. China's exports have made the country 2.1k dollars in the year of 2013. China could also take over because they are nearly out of dept unlike the United states which are in dept by 16k dollars in 2013 and China was in dept at 1.2k dollars. China has been able to keep their economy stable as they send out exports and take in imports.

Military winner: China

All of the residence of China are required to be trained in the military. When the kids in China get to high school they are required to take military training in case of emergency.China also has the biggest military which not only makes people stronger but makes the nearby and other countries fear China.

Political power winner: China

China became communist so other countries joined in and became Communist. China has showed other countries that their country makes wise decisions that is for the best so other countries follow along. China has influenced other countries by their imports and exports and setting a goal that countries want to mew. China has led many countries to be influenced by them.

Final thoughts:

China could win because overall China has overcome the United States goals and excitements. China can maintain there economics, China can make their forces stronger, and China can take political power by influencing other countries. The United States have fallen short of the achievements of China

It was wrong for the United States to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki because both the little boy and fat man took lives from about 120,000 innocent people.To add on as well as 90 percent of the city was wiped out by the little boy. Another reason why the United States should not of done that because when a country drops a bomb on another country it means war and that is what the United States got. After the two bombs hit Japan the United States and Japanese started world war 2. In the end the Japanese surrendered. In conclusion I do not think it was a good idea for the United States to drop the bombs.

http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/bombing-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki

I disagree with your statement because if the United States didn't drop the bomb there wouldn't be a war which is why it was not a good idea for the United States to drop the bomb.

http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/bombing-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki

I agree with this statement because the United States should not be concerned about North Korea or Kim Jon-un because if we happen to say something to North Korea that affects them North Korea and the United States could start war.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40882877

I disagree with this statement because in 1994 North Korea and the United States had an armed conflict. Although North Korea threatens to send a nucleus bomb over to the United States there has been no evidence of Kim Jon-un planning any bombs.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40882877

The United states should not be concerned about Kim Jon-un because Kim Jon-un is only saying he will bomb the United States there is no evidence or actions from Kim Jon-un that shows that he will bomb the United States. The United States should not be concerned about Kim Jon-un or North Korea because in 1994, there was an armed conflict between the United States and North Korea. North Korea has constantly been threatening to send a nuclear bomb to the United States. The United States should not be concerned about North Korea or Kim Jon-un for these reasons.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40882877

The United states should not be concerned about Kim Jon-un because Kim Jon-un is only saying he will bomb the United States there is no evidence or actions from Kim Jon-un that shows that he will bomb the United States. The United States should not be concerned about Kim Jon-un or North Korea because in 1994, there was an armed conflict between the United States and North Korea. North Korea has constantly been threatening to send a nuclear bomb to the United States. The United States should not be concerned about North Korea or Kim Jon-un for these reasons.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40882877

The 5 countries in the security council should not have veto power because it does not give all the countries in the United Nations a chance to vote to decide in a situation. In Syria some of the deadliest situations are happening and "its is paralyzed by disagreement and veto's". Because of veto power the problems are either unsolved or solved in a very slow manner. Veto power should not be given to the security council for this reason.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2015/sep/23/un-security-council-failing-70-years