- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
well to be fair, binary is about as simple as one can get.
objective Reality does not depend on consensus (universal or otherwise).
did you observe that phenomena in many species of animals within a social construct...? perhaps
taking life is not considered immoral de facto by many human cultures. i'm not sure what planet you are referring to...???
also, using Man's flawed views of ethics is hardly what we would consider "evidence" of Morality... that would be silly. again just because something can be objective and universally True, does not necessarily mean that thing will be understood and agreed upon in some sort of consensus. can you imagine trying to do your Science the same way??? that would be completely retarded...
who believes morality is some inherent part of human cognition and not a learned program in the human brain
God hasn't clarified this. and scientists definitely won't be able to discern this. it is reasonable to assume that there is a significant percentage hardwired. the easiest way to test this theory is on subjects who were never instructed. but we still can't rule out self-taught. it is overwhelming taught, which is why it isn't usually debated.