Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 8 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 8 |
Debates: | 0 |
"why do we debate"? i debate because it gets you focus,and sparks enthusiasm in you. debating forces you to become active in speaking out,presenting others with your point view on issues of the world and topics important to you.
Could Earth really be HOLLOW?i don't think so.besides the outer part of
earth and the land in which everyone is familar with,the earth also consist of layers which make up the inner section.such as the
crust,uppermantle,lowermantle,outercore and the innercore.the thicker layers like the lower mantle and innercore are more heavier/soild layers. and the crust,uppermantle and lowermantle are the more lighter/soild layers. lastly the core is in contrast from layers that cover it due to the fact that its made of extremely hot molten rock. with this being said, i think the earth is far from being hollow.
i also disagree that "good teachers" lead to good learners. the reason
being is that most students,even if theres a good teacher present, the teacher may need to know how certain students learn, sense everyone is different they may need to help them pinpoint certain areas in there education, that there having difficuities with and focus on them.some students may need
reading comprehension,resoning skills or some may need a well-detailed understanding of a leason. with that i think every student can learn well.
"To experience the true beauty of suffering you have to live its grim reality"hmm...thats something to ponder,but doesn,t being beautiful depend on what you percieve as beautiful?some people in the world for example feel you need make up,designer clothes,shoes,to fit in a certain social class aswell how you look to others.i know that this can make one emotionally burden about there appearences,having others putting you down and making you feel worthless,its who you are that really makes all the difference.what makes us individual like our eyes,nose,ears,hair,the way we dress,the way we
carry ourselves aswell as our talents are what make us beautiful and
unique indiviuals, not to mention the people we are in side.how kind we are, how patient we are and how we spend and share our lives with others.these qualities are unique and special no matter what others say or pecieve as beautiful, its only there opinion.the only non beauty in the world is the lack of these qualities which truly makes an individual suffer.
another good skill to have is logical consistency.which helps one to show how each reason for the topic or issue being debated flows smoothly.its
always important when debating,to present your evidence well enough in
a way that everything complements one another.also staying on topic
threw out the debate.these skills are important in giving you an advantage,for a well-organized and well-sound arguement.
i have a different view to present in this debate,and i,ll explain.Bigfoot is one of the most renowned Cryptids ever known.it just can,t be concluded "that this creature doesn,t exist"i believe theres more to it then that.were dealing with sightings that date back more then thousands of years ago by various people over the globe. in areas such as Canada,Newyork and New Mexico just to name a few.on top of that the same eyewitness descriptions were given of this creature:a bipedal about 7-10 feet,weighting about 500 pounds,with body proportions similar to a human,s and covered all over with fur.with this being explain tells me that theres way more to it then a hoax.that theres something out there, very rare and elusive that has yet to be discovered.
link 1:http://www.Wikipedia.com/Bigfoot
link 2:http://www.bulbapedia.com/Snorlax
i disagree with the possibly that snorlax is Bigfoot,and I'll explain.my first reason for this being is that Snorlax has a round shape body with green colored skin, with a height of 6,11 and weighing about 1014 pounds.Bigfoot's body is proprotion closely resembling a human shape,also with a body covered all over with hair and about a height of 6-10 feet with a weight of 500 pounds.another reason i believe Snorlax to not be Bigfoot is the fact that Snorlax doesn,t have great speed for its size.on the other hand with Bigfoot-for its large size,
is very nimble.lastly Bigfoot and Snorlax foot prints are very distinctive.one being Snorlax has a more rounded foot with little sharp claws at the tip and Bigfoot foot print appears to be similar to a human being foot but with sizes ranging from 15-20 feet.with all of this being said it could easy be seen that these two are not one of the same and that those reasons that were mentioned early, that connect them present some flaws.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |