- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
i would say yes.
because in the 19th ages people were looking on making every thing easy for the future but never stooped to realize what harm may it cause to the future generation and one of the harms is laziness because this generation has found things very easy and doesn't bother too look back on how things are made or should be improved hence setting a limit for their activities meaning laziness
i woud say that GOD does exist but not gods.
i always give proof after my argument and i would say that if there was no god or super natural power the reasons to live for or give meaning to life would be savage or few while those who belive in god see the future of the world in peace,happines and other thinks..
i gues that if there was no evidence of super natural power neither you or me should have been able to control the savagery of the world..
in my opinion i don't think there is any one who can say that he is appropriate enough to inherit the kingdom of heaven but however a part of the heart tells us other wise and the other part that this world is part of as so i don't have an answer ......................
I BELIEVE IN GOD BECAUSE MAN COULD NOT HAVE CREATED HIM SELF NEITHER FELT UNEXPLAINABLE SITUATIONS IN HIS LIFE WHILE THE BIBLE GIVES DEFINITIONS AND REVELATIONS OF THE LONG TERMED LIFE OF MAN KIND.
BESIDE WHO IS THERE ANY ONE WHO DARES TO HAVE MADE OR CAN CHANGE IS LIFE IN HIS OWN WAYS.
MY OPINION IS THAT MAN IS SCAR THAT WHAT HE HAS DONE MAY NOT BE RIGHT AND THATS WHY HE IS TRYING TO ESCAPE FROM THE TRUTH.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!