- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Very dense indeed.
Correct. I am reminded of the time you spent four days steadfastly denying that the Iraq War was illegal. The bottom line is that you have never, not once, ever, admitted you are wrong. And the reason for that is because you are a moronic, dishonest, pathologically narcissistic halfwit.
It’s impossible to know what exactly you fail to understand about “an immediate family member with a known clean history
No, what is impossible to understand is why you are seemingly unaware of the dimension called time. People are only CRIMINALS after they are CONVICTED OF A CRIME. Hence, Ted Bundy (and millions of others) who either murder or fantasise about murdering are able to legally obtain a firearm. What you have actually written here is a total contradiction of itself, since you say a background check (which checks whether your history is clean) should not be performed on an immediate family member with a known clean history!! It's paradoxical gibberish.
If Bundy has a clean record, then he would pass a background check
Well congratulations. You got there in the end mate. Pat yourself on the back.
and his brother commits no crime in passing him a gun
If bundy has a record, then his brother knows it, and breaks the law in passing Bundy a gun.
NO!! If Bundy DOESN'T TELL his brother about his record, then his brother can pass him the gun and argue he had a known clean history.
You should probably shut up now. Which I believe is your cue to write me ten thousand words.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!