No, I said that you were talking about "I love this site, therefore I am on here, therefore this site is better". However, if we take this debate to debate.org, then the people on there will say the exact same thing. I am not saying that that website should copy every debate from here word for word to their website.

I can argue this:

"still debate.org would be better because createdebate would be a cheatercock and... debate.org is not a cheater as createdebate" This has a different conclusion, but it works just as well as your argument. You can call any one of those websites a cheater, but that is just subjective.

This means that if we took the same debate to debate.org, then debate.org will win, despite the objective quality of both websites not changing. Personal preference is not really something you can conclude things with. It is useful for making decisions for yourself, but it is subjective.

against zoophilia-agree atheist-agree pro abortion-disagree Anti gun control-agree I'm anti sexism-agree I put humans over animals-agree I eat all types of foods (omnivore)-agree I am mostly pro death penalty-disagree

Science is not a false dichotomy, because science was not forcing you to choose between two black and white views (e.g. creationism and satan)

The topic is whether evolution is supported by scientific fact, not if it is scientific fact. That is undebatable.

Evolution is supported by scientific fact. Main arguments:

1. Contrary to popular belief, transitional fossils have been found. In fact, we have seen transitional fossils everywhere, and they do align up with what evolution predicts. [1] By transitional fossils, I mean the intermediate forms of evolution between organisms, not cartoonish half duck half crocodiles.

2.Speciation, or macroevolution has been observed. The creation of a new species of the goatsbeard plant that were fertile, but could only breed with plants in the same species, is one example. [2]

[1]http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html#morphological_intermediates

[2]http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html

Views to a debate does not affect the amount of points you have. However, people who post on those debates that are popular due to NSFW themes do get more points, as their arguments get more views, and if the argument is good, more upvotes.

This argument is flawed as it is a baseless assertion. Which website you are currently browsing does not affect its quality.

While both websites allow for good, intelligent debating, there are core differences:

Debate.org allows the person who creates the debate to choose whether or not voting requires voters to type a reason. This reduces votes that are done due to the side the argument is on, rather than the quality of the argument. The votes are not a number, but rather the usernames and what they voted for is open to everyone, reducing biased votes.

Debate.org has multiple debate formats: 1 on 1, polls, and opinions. Createdebate has for/against (similiar to opinions, but allows votes), and perspective.

However, both websites suit different people. For every argument for one website, you can find 3 arguments for the other.