CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Johnny5

Reward Points:135
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:95
Debates:15
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

dave chappelle is literally a comedian. its his job to reduce things into caricatures. And to be fair, the biggest one I saw was the KKK. But either way, he is not a sociologist.

1 point

So your argument is there is 15.5 million and not 14 million.

wikipedia has infinitely more credibility than you do. The contention that wikipedia is generically unreliable on important stats, is a lot less reliable than the assertion it isnt. Wikipedia uses sources. Your contention uses myths and rhetoric.

Your argument about Jews being threatened by history is a decent one. However as I alluded to, the largest 2 populations are USA and Israel, both of whom are nuclear nations with no foreseeable reason to attack Jews.

1 point

You left out the UK and France. Both have up to 3 times as many nukes as Israel and a blue water navy. Israel cant nuke the planet with 80 nukes. It could potentially take out every major capital or destroy one country. In a conventional context, Israel could obviously more than own the middle east, unless it got caught in a kamikaze situation. As for the nuclear 5, what they have above all is deployment. A blue water navy means nukes can be launched even if the nation is gone. This effectively makes you unbeatable. Its a doomsday button. Anyone stupid enough to launch an all out attack on France or the UK would never be able to find the location of the submarine fleet, in time before their own nation was vaporised. Furthermore, the fleet may be deep in the ocean, and are still fully capable of launching from there. Potentially, even America and Russia would effectively be stalemated by this.

As for America, she too has a blue water navy, and describes this as "The Defense Security Service of the United States has defined the blue-water navy as, "a maritime force capable of sustained operation across the deep waters of open oceans."

Russia, USA and China also arguably have land/air based deployment that can be relied upon for second strike capacity. France has the third biggest force on the planet and maintains a nuclear triad in theory and an air and sea force in practice.

Pakistan has more nukes than India.

1 point

Eventually it may well happen............................................

1 point

Consenting adults.

Its not important to me why people are gay. They are grown ups and have freedom of association. Kids are not and do not, in the same way.

1 point

You all make some good points. I dont know. My knee jerk reaction is against such a thing, but then I dont run society and I can see the arguments for it too. Kids need role models and right or wrong, sexuality is part of that.

Im not a fan of people who deride liberals, but this philosophy does have its limits and usually they centre around the concept of competent consent, and consenting adults. A child by definition is not part of that construct.

So... do we act like it has no moral or role model bearing on the child? Also, is it not the price of homosexuality by definition - ie you dont have kids with another man or woman?

Its a good question, and I think it should be earnestly debated as such.

1 point

Dont bring family into it trollingface. I understand he made it personal with race, but the topic will attract fans and foes, of the great jewish religion, because of the subject matter. He wasnt making it specifically personal to you, unless he was doing so by relation. His first post was a bit more eloquent. His second was was a bad one in my opinion, but his family is off limits, but he will be banned and reported if he is not careful.

I dont want you to get banned and reported, so keep family out of it, thank you.

1 point

its effectively calling a stereotypical black person a nigger and subscribing to this stereotype, which in itself is racist, as it reduces an entire group of people to one poor caricature of a comedy character. it then reduces another group of people to a gross association with this stereotyped representation of a people.

its inaccurate, short-handed and a great example of casual contemporary racism.

1 point

funny, thats exactly what al queada think about themselves...

everyone thinks they are gods chosen people.

how about cult, supremacist, and a no.

1 point

you think anyone who isnt anti semitic is idf? im pretty sure you are the weird one in this convo.

how many jews are there on planet earth?

13,746,100–17,936,400 (wikipedia)

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Yes, given the time frame.
Winning Position: Yeah, love is love
Winning Position: Nope
Winning Position: Nope cos the rock is black
Winning Position: Yes, they are scum.
Winning Position: Guns arent that important

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here