Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 7 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 89% |
Arguments: | 5 |
Debates: | 0 |
We have already seen animals adapt to different climates, so if the animal has genetically changed itself and its offspring, what makes you think that over thousands of years that we couldn't slowly become more intelligent and physically adapted to the point where we are now? At this point I would like you to prove that macro evolution is not true and prove how a spirit-like being in a story book is a better explanation than evolution.
I'm only on the cloning side of the argument IF nobody would misuse the technology and only the government or NASA and organizations like these could use it under extreme surveillance. However, it would only be used with species whose numbers are low and they're endangered or almost endangered. We wouldn't use this technology to make money, it would be used to repopulate and fulfill nature back into the world.
Science has already shown that animals can adapt, so what makes people think that evolution couldn't happen? Plus, for a human to just appear would be completely absurd because all cells come from other living cells, so for a complex, multi-celled organ system to just appear on earth is just out of the question.
If doctors are saving lives and all football players are doing is entertaining people, why should they be paid more? A doctor can help heal a football player's injuries, there are doctors ready at the game to make sure players don't have injuries, and without doctors most of us probably would've died by now because we wouldn't be able to cure something we had. Don't get me wrong, I love football but I don't value it as much as other peoples' lives. If you think football players should be paid more, remember that you would've been dead without doctors so who deserves more money? An entertainer or a hero?
If doctors are saving lives and all football players are doing is entertaining people, why should they be paid more? A doctor can help heal a football player's injuries, there are doctors ready at the game to make sure players don't have injuries, and without doctors most of us probably would've died by now because we wouldn't be able to cure something we had. Don't get me wrong, I love football but I don't value it as much as other peoples' lives. If you think football players should be paid more, remember that you would've been dead without doctors so who deserves more money? An entertainer or a hero?
|