Okay, I don't care whether or not intelligence gives you a good career or makes you rich. Those can happen by chance. But the advancement of technology, science, and society are the affects of intelligence. The computer and Internet we are all typing away at are products of intellience!!! I can't believe any of you would say that it's overrated when you all use a by product of it. If you think that its overrated then you think we are all better without it. By all means, go live your life in the stone-age.

No one on earth can prove or disprove that ANY god exists. But there are those who believe and those who don't. Atheists, like myself, believe that there are no gods. Period. No higher beings, no watchers, or caretakers. But we only believe that because it is the only thing that makes sense. If there was an actual logical and reasonable religion, nearly every single atheist would convert in a heartbeat. Just like Agnostics. Except, Agnostics think they feel a power greater than theirs. And so, I say Agnosticism is basicaly Atheism, and there by being the only neutral position.

When looking at Life, in contrast to the universe; No, we have no reason to be. We are not able to change anything in our universe. The universe barely even knows we exsist. But, in contrast to the Earth or to other animals; yes we have a purpose. People ask "why are we here" we are here because our ansectors need 2 legs, apposible thumbs, and intellect of agriculture to survive. And so we were formed from their need to live. And so we carry that same purpose.

If time travel is possible, then one theory you'd probably like is the Parallel Universe Theory. In which, if you went back in time and fucked around, it would not affect this universe, you'd just not be in it. But you would be changing the time line of that universe. But if that theory turns out to be false and you actually go back in time and some don't hit paradoxes that cause bad shit to happen, then you'd be fucking with everyones life. But I guess the good thing is that we would know that it could've been different, but you would. And you'd have to live your irresponibility.

And what size is that? size of the sun, earth, bowling ball, marble? And singularity, by definition, is infinitly dense. Density is mass divided by volume. So if it infinitely dense, then i'm sure it's safe to assume that is also infinitly massive and small.

One of Eistein's biggest mistakes was saying that the universe was static. He believed that the universe could be finite and hold everything. But Hubble found that it isn't static, its growing at an increasing rate with no sign of stopping.

Yes, the instantaneous volume of the universe is finite. But if the volume is boundless, then it will grow to an immeasurable size. Making it infinite.

The universe is spherical. And so if you start traveling from the universe's "North pole" and travel south, you will eventially end up back at the north pole, yes.But if the sphere is growing at an increasing rate, and that acceleration has no bounds, then it will accelerate into infinity as will the volume of the sphere. Meaning you can never fully travel back to that original spot, unless you didn't move from it.

It's quite simple. Evidence shows that the universe is expanding and an increasing accelleration. Well if it started acceleration 14 billion years ago, its going damn fast now. Making it very plausible that the universe is infinite.