Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 3 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
i believe both forms of government proposed in this arguement are wrong. while there are certain things i would take out of a dictatorship i still beleive they are both wrong. ararchism is chaos and anarchy and a dictatorship is totalitarian and restricting. the best form of governmnet is a form of dictatorship, but one where the people have freedom of speech and whichis fair.
you are completely wrong. no hierarchy? are you crazy? society cannot function without a hierarchy. who will make the choices of society? the common masses? ones who have no education and have no idea what they are talking about, ones who care only for their own interests? society can be fair, but it can't make us all kings. people should be able to voice thier oppinions in the workplace, but a hierarchy must remain so the people are working towards a common goal.
exactly. anarchism means that people are looking afrter themselves only, and as such the great masses of humanity get nowhere. anarchism is freedom, but unrestrained, creating a civilisation of chaos and anarchy. a nation cannot grow powerful on chaos. for instance we have laws right? they restrict freedom, but it looks after the masses, not the individual. this is the way to go, not the path of desruction that is anarchy
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |