Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Lionard1122
| Reward Points: | 35 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 94% |
| Arguments: | 47 |
| Debates: | 0 |
ok, this sounds absurd to me
"To me, my God is the one true God", what does that mean? do you believe in that god? do you hold the opinion that he is real?
well if you are talking about the Christian god than that directly contradicts the Islamic god, for example, so you cant believe in both... being "willing to accept other peoples faith in their God" isn't the same as believing in that god yourself and is not what the argument above proposed
and no, "acknowledgement that those Gods could exist." is also not the same as believeing in them
ok, this is SO idiotic...
thats just a basic law of logic, in mathematics (and science in general) you have to PROVE something to be true, you cant just say "look at the trees, dont they seem created" or give a theoretical model...
if i tell you unicorns exist will you just believe me? or will you ask for evidence to back up that assertion? will you just believe anything without proof? how do you check what's true and what isn't?
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
the only reason im responding to you is this: "and you don't even know how the first living cell mystically and magically popped to life", lets clear up this logical fallacy
yes, we dont know how did the first living organism come to exist... we already know of a couple of options which could have occured but we will probably never know the exact reason and event... but that doesnt mean we cant prove all living creatures are connected in a family tree and trace it all back to one living organism, yes we dont know everything... but religion doesnt know anything, it just assumes everything instead
more specifically this logical fallacy is called "god of the gaps" or as i like to call it "we dont know, therefore god": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godofthe_gaps
1 and 2 both make sense in combination with 3 (which was my main point) and your explanation for 3 doesnt make much sense:
what "very conscious decision"? groups split off and combine all the time in the animal kingdom... or else there would only be one group of each species, frankly thats something only we humans manage to do, and no it wouldnt have to be such a huge group, why would it?
|
||||||||||||
