Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!

Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

View All

View All

View All

RSS Logan145

Reward Points:6
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

6 most recent arguments.
1 point

The end goal of the deal is not in our favor. After the 15 year deal is up, we are going to have a terrorist dominated country with a newly strengthened economy with access to nuclear warfare developments. This deal is gradually setting up Iran to dominate the Middle East and attempt to take over the western world. This deal is disregarding the longevity of world peace.

0 points

Logan H

The Iran Deal is a temporary fix. We will prevent and monitor nuclear developments for only 15 years and then the deal is up. We are also greatly loosening our dominance over Iran's economy during this 15 year period. Once the deal has expired, Iran's economy will have enough momentum to make nuclear developments, and they will have better odds of making advancements over the United States.

2 points

The Constitution is vital for a consistently functional government. We can not take the risk of letting the people rule a government. They will have the potential of forming an anarchy without supervision. Also, people often have severely differing views, and without a strong central government, there would not be an efficient solution. It is much easier to sustain a government with a set of definite laws.

1 point

Option 4 seems like the easy way out. If we pull out of the peninsula, we allow North Korea to build its nuclear program unsupervised. This would greatly damage the reputation of the United States as the "world police".

logan145(6) Clarified
1 point

To clarify, we must handle North Korea in stages. By beginning with a peaceful approach, we can evaluate North Korea's response. If they fail to cooperate, then we can begin to take it a step further. We should not preemptively jump to military attacks.

1 point

Option (3)

I believe option 3 is the best approach in initially dealing with North Korea. We should establish trust between our two nations in order to impede the progression of nuclear weapons. Since North Korea is developing nuclear weapons to initiate power over other countries, we should remove any imposing threats. If they persist to act irrational, then we can reference militaristic tactics.

Logan145 has not yet created any debates.

About Me

I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here