Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 3 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 75% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
yes i agree with you, I think you make a very valid point. If we have a large government, then we wont have as many freedoms. The whole point of america was to have a country based on democracy with a government to protect indivudal rights from other people. having a large republic disputes all of that.
federalist: The Constitution is necessary, whereas the bill of rights is not. when we give people the freedom they deserve, there will be inequality and difference, but to prevent this we have to make freedoms severely limited. we need a large republic with a strong central government with weaker sub-governments for the states. we do not want a dictatorship, this would cause the majority to rule and chaos among the group with dictators with pure democracy. we will have a increased variety of parties, thus giving us the advantage. we therefore reach for a republican remedy.
Anti federalist: The constitution should not be ratified, instead it should be replaced by the articles of confederation. We want more freedom, and we fear that the constution will not provide that for us. The new government with the constution will be too powerful, and threaten indivudial liberties. The central government would also become too powerful. the constutuion will put courts in the states and they will have more ppower of the supreme clause.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |