- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Time travel is Labrador, winding back 'recorded events displayed in order' is Canines. I will explain why it's that if you want, it's to do with something called a wormhole that stops it being anything but that.
Boy, I'd love to be a fly on the wall in your brain.
It's just such a pity that you lack the fundamentally tiny degree of intellect it requires to understand the gargantuan difference between comparing a process which occurs over two dimensions to one which occurs over four.
Agreed. It takes a particularly special type of retard to steal the argument of one considerably more intelligent than he and STILL lose. Lol.
He’s an authority on the subject at hand you Troll
No he isn't you fucking liar. He's a professor of computer science in Texas. He has no qualifications in quantum mechanics. You're just a shocking moron, Jody. Absolutely shocking.
Scott Joel Aaronson is an American theoretical computer scientist and David J. Bruton Jr. Centennial Professor of Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin
Thanks to irresponsible people taking on loans
They were sold those loans by the banks, you incredibly corrupt little rat. It is THE BANK'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE A CUSTOMER IS RESPONSIBLE WHEN IT LENDS THEM MONEY. I literally cannot believe you are trying to blame the people for bad loans sold to them deliberately by the banks.
The banks do not lose out by selling mortgage loans to irresponsible customers because they are leveraged against property owned by the bank. Not unless everybody defaults at the same time, which is exactly what happened during the recession. The banks were selling bad loans deliberately to customers they knew couldn't afford them because they thought it was a win-win situation.
Banned for blaming the poor for a recession which had absolutely nothing to do with them. I am finding it difficult to imagine a bigger shill or a more disgusting person than you are, Bronto.
Get the fuck out of my thread you utterly corrupt piece of fucking shit.
All I said was that destroying McDonald's would cost a lot of jobs
That's a bullshit argument. All companies employ people. Employing people is what companies do. It has no bearing on whether the impact they are making on society is positive or negative. Should tobacco companies be permitted to continue selling a product which kills literally millions of people on the grounds that stopping them will cost a few thousand jobs? Should industrial oil businesses be permitted to continue polluting the atmosphere because they also provide jobs? It's a stupid argument.
I hate to say this, but you're an idiot. Sorry, but it's the truth. Sucks to be you.
You have only discredited yourself with this. You are obviously very joyous about calling me an idiot, because you had ample opportunity to simply shut your retarded mouth and not say a word. Hence, the fact that you have begun your reply with a completely transparent lie ultimately discredits your opinion about truth.
Sucks to be you.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!