Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS Masterofall

Reward Points:5
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Time travel is Labrador, winding back 'recorded events displayed in order' is Canines. I will explain why it's that if you want, it's to do with something called a wormhole that stops it being anything but that.

Boy, I'd love to be a fly on the wall in your brain.

2 points

Winding your video back

Winding a video back reverses the evolution of a two dimensional image projected into four dimensional space. Winding an electron back reverses the evolution of four dimensional space.

You dumb Irish shit.

2 points

Winding your video back

Winding a video back reverses the evolution of a two dimensional image projected into four dimensional space. Winding an electron back reverses the evolution of four dimensional space.

You dumb Irish shit.

masterofall(5) Clarified
1 point

It's just such a pity that you lack the fundamentally tiny degree of intellect it requires to understand the gargantuan difference between comparing a process which occurs over two dimensions to one which occurs over four.

Agreed. It takes a particularly special type of retard to steal the argument of one considerably more intelligent than he and STILL lose. Lol.

1 point

He’s an authority on the subject at hand you Troll

No he isn't you fucking liar. He's a professor of computer science in Texas. He has no qualifications in quantum mechanics. You're just a shocking moron, Jody. Absolutely shocking.

Scott Joel Aaronson is an American theoretical computer scientist and David J. Bruton Jr. Centennial Professor of Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin

1 point

There is nothing Capitalistic about tax money bailing out private companies.

Banned for straw man argumentation.

3 points

Thanks to irresponsible people taking on loans


They were sold those loans by the banks, you incredibly corrupt little rat. It is THE BANK'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE A CUSTOMER IS RESPONSIBLE WHEN IT LENDS THEM MONEY. I literally cannot believe you are trying to blame the people for bad loans sold to them deliberately by the banks.

The banks do not lose out by selling mortgage loans to irresponsible customers because they are leveraged against property owned by the bank. Not unless everybody defaults at the same time, which is exactly what happened during the recession. The banks were selling bad loans deliberately to customers they knew couldn't afford them because they thought it was a win-win situation.

Banned for blaming the poor for a recession which had absolutely nothing to do with them. I am finding it difficult to imagine a bigger shill or a more disgusting person than you are, Bronto.

Get the fuck out of my thread you utterly corrupt piece of fucking shit.

2 points

All I said was that destroying McDonald's would cost a lot of jobs

That's a bullshit argument. All companies employ people. Employing people is what companies do. It has no bearing on whether the impact they are making on society is positive or negative. Should tobacco companies be permitted to continue selling a product which kills literally millions of people on the grounds that stopping them will cost a few thousand jobs? Should industrial oil businesses be permitted to continue polluting the atmosphere because they also provide jobs? It's a stupid argument.

1 point

YOU are the one who called ME a retard. You started it

I thoroughly enjoyed pointing out that you are a retard and I made no false claims otherwise. Hence, I am still a reliable source. You are a demonstrable liar.

2 points

I hate to say this, but you're an idiot. Sorry, but it's the truth. Sucks to be you.

You have only discredited yourself with this. You are obviously very joyous about calling me an idiot, because you had ample opportunity to simply shut your retarded mouth and not say a word. Hence, the fact that you have begun your reply with a completely transparent lie ultimately discredits your opinion about truth.

Sucks to be you.

Displaying 3 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Unresolved
Winning Position: Satan Worshipper

About Me

I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here