Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS Missliberal

Reward Points:30
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
1 point

However, walking around "clothesfree" is just asking for people to look at you with lust. Again, I would not judge anyone choosing nudity as a lifestyle, but it is not for me.

1 point

Most likely. Even without the Bible, life is living proof that God exists. There has to be someone above man.

2 points

Not in'd freeze! Nudism is only an option during the warm seasons in Canada and the United States. And I will say this again, human sexuality is for one's devoted/married partner and it is inappropriate to share our bodies with everyone we see!

1 point

I personally would not judge anyone who was choosing that life style. However, isn't sexuality something we should keep special for our married/devoted partner?

1 point

Yes Steve, I know that. However, he did not get to lead the opposition for a long period of time so, Canada wasn't given the amazing opportunity of truly knowing him as a leader. I think he would have been a wonderful leader however, Canada needed to see more of him.

1 point

I see where you are coming from. However, if we give the opportunity to vote to our youth, then they will become more familiar with politics and will be seasoned and experienced voters by the time they turn 18!

1 point

Yes! If one is intelligent enough to have a political opinion, one should be intelligent enough to put that opinion to use!

2 points

You are absolutely correct! Plus, youth are part of the country too, we deserve to be treated like citizens!

1 point

So technically you’re saying young people should have a voice; however people should just ignore it. If you want us to share our opinions, give us a ballad and we will!

2 points

You are stereotyping! Of course there's going to be gangs and riots; just like there was during the youth of the generation before us. However, just because some youth are mislead, it does not mean that all youth are mislead! Also, there are adults involved in riots and gangs; there are also adults who are involved in much worse things! You are being completely ignorant and I believe that you owe today's youth an apology.

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Liberal
Tied Positions: No, they shouldn't vs. Yes, they should

About Me

"I love the arts, linguistics, teaching/tutoring and debating!"

Biographical Information
Gender: Female
Marital Status: In a Relationship
Political Party: Democrat
Country: Canada
Religion: Catholic

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here