CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Mohammedalam

Reward Points:7
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
87%
Arguments:17
Debates:2
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Always considered cleaning as an agony. But recently my old vacuum cleaner went down. I got into the Internet and found the site https://devices4home.com/best-canister-vacuum/. My life is shared on before and after. The new vacuum cleaner is really the best canister vacuum cleaner. Here he really sucks, not like my old vacuum cleaner. I began to spend on cleaning in half the time.

1 point

At the end of your discussion you ask two opposing questions, "Is A true or is B true?" But we can only answer "Yes" or "No". This makes the response tricky.

Going with the original question then, "Have the New-Atheists redefined the term 'atheism'?" Then the answer is no. They've clarified the term.

Theism is about whether you have a belief in a god, goddess, or gods, so being without that belief, an atheist in the strictest interpretation of its Latin roots, does not necessarily mean a belief that there are no gods. Atheism is merely the absence of a belief in gods, being without a belief in gods.

A baby, for example, has no concept of gods, therefore is implicitly without a belief in gods. The baby is therefore an atheist. But since the baby has no concept of gods, s/he cannot believe that no gods exist. If you insist that atheism is the rejection of the belief in gods, then we have no label to describe this state, since even agnosticism requires first a knowledge of the concept of gods. The clearer definition, however, works just fine to include people with no knowledge of gods, and therefore no belief in gods.

The problem is that the old definitions were rarely used since there were few real atheists until recently. Therefore the definition didn't need to be particularly clear. It was mainly used as a way to slander people originally anyways. Now that there are many real atheists, the term needs to be clearer. And I don't think that "clarification" is the same as "redefinition" here, since the core of the term's definition remains the same.

1 point

One thing to remember about parents is that they can't always be there for their children. Children have friends, acquaintances, idols, teachers, coaches, etc that also play parts in a kid's upbringing and the parents can't always be there to supervise, like if the kids are at school and the parents are at work. Sure, parents are the most important people in a child's upbringing, but they aren't the only people interacting with the child.

1 point

I support it, for the following reasons:

-Babies that aren't wanted aren't going to be loved, there will likely grow in broken homes and have poor social bonds, and then turn to a life of crime.

-Earth's resources are scarce, and another individual consuming them is not the answer.

-This baby's future dreams may be more then what society can handle or is willing to give to the child, which may not be a problem with one individual, but may become one with hundreds of individuals.

-I believe with more people it becomes more difficult to care for their well being. I can only use stimulator video game like Roller Coaster Tycoon, but usually if there is more conflicting complaints then I can handle, I shut the level off.

-Corporations only want large populations so wages can continue to decrease and production can rise, at the expense of the environment.

-More individuals to be responsible for often makes you only agree more with them then challenge their opinions and lifestyles as a time-saving measure,

-The morality of abortion largely lies on the expectant mother, and no else, be it friends, government, etcf. However, there should be free lessons for the woman informing her of what she's getting herself into.

1 point

I appreciate rap for what it can do- add diversity to sonic soundscapes, let socially disadvantaged have a say in life, provide an outlet to new forms of songwriting (more rhyme and emphasis on the beats aka beatboxing)

That being said, not all rappers are the same, but the styles employed by artists who are mainstream are considered all there is to rap (uneducated chain-smoking thugs and wankstas wearing patterned hoodies hungry for attention and appealing to the lowest common denominator to make a profit). This is especially hard in making other people appreciate rap, especially if they have been growing up to rock and classical.

1 point

First off, wealth is intertwined to the purchasing power of the people in general, so if they are unable to purchase the products, the company will have to reduce prices in order to make a sale. Paying people a penny is not going to be the wisest choice in that regard, since it is going to become progressively harder to make a profit.

Secondly, what I find with people who are unemployed is that the system for getting them a job is beyond their control, usually impeded by the internal politics and/or HR department and/or the hiring manger of the employing association or because they will never know if it is something to do with the resume or their appearance.

And you really shouldn't be applying everywhere in your town in the first place because you're qualifications are not likely to match up and you are just making it difficult for the organization in question to find the right person because now they are burdened with even more paperwork or E-mails, paper and/or broadband which could have been put to better use finding the right candidate.

1 point

Apes and humans evolved from an unknown common ancestor. This ancestor split up and evolved into different species, one became erect and the other continued as it was.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/If_people_evolved_from_apes_why_are_there_still_apes#ixzz27caWiHhd

1 point

Humans have evolved in a different way than chimps, gorillas and orangutans because the requirements of the environment we found ourselves in were different. It was an advantage for us to go in the direction we went, just as it was for the other apes.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/If_people_evolved_from_apes_why_are_there_still_apes#ixzz27cZgyp87

1 point

Oil brings money,

Money brings corruption.

Corruption brings instability.

1 point

then it should be OK to kill some people to save others, human life is not sacrosanct

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Shorter/Same School Holidays

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here