Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 269 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 98% |
Arguments: | 166 |
Debates: | 28 |
A system where theistic people should worry about God dictating them, and people who are atheistic shouldn't even care in the first place. It's not a system but helpful mind set for those who have nothing else to argue about. I can easily say that God can dictate others but I wont submit to him because I have my own desires and wishes to bring to life.
Fine, I believe you. Neither did I take it seriously, I just went up to the first website which came up in Google. I just want to find the contradictions by this website users to post them. And possibly to irritate some religious people,
Even if your logic is persistent and true, having sexual contact to a dog for example doesn't make it any less vile or wrong. That's even funny how the title asks governments approval to fk animals, it just sounds insanely wrong. But just that fact, when animals can interfere with humans in some sort of way, it would make a good excuse to have sex with the animal? You didn't say the reason, or at least I can't see it.
I would tolerate a president who doesn't inflict biblical morals as laws upon the society much more, and kept my admiration towards him for his real hard work. - But i don't see really a point in voting for someone just because of his religion or culture, still I might have an idea. We choose a man or a woman who can represent us to other countries. And I wouldn't want to be part of the failure if that occurs.
I wasn't curious to debate on this topic. I was curious to catch out people who would claim that Bible is perfect,while they would debate to someone like you who's answer to this question would be yes. - Don't consider me being a fool. And such question as trivial as it sounds.
#PRO 4:7 Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.
#ECC 1:18 For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
#1CO 1:19: "For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent."
I got one example from a website -> http://infidels.org/library/modern/
True. You know when people usually say that animals are our friends, and they are just like us. Well I would disagree with their words. There is a thin gap for me, there is no significant value to this debate. I just attached to one statement, and wondered how many people would odd out.
Agree, nothing more can be said. I know people who would've said that animals are like humans, which is nonsense.
You deleted my argument because you were butt hurt. And try to delete this one, you'll only confirm my words.
|