CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Mrcatsam3

Reward Points:15
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
96%
Arguments:13
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Keep in mind it's usually only YOU who responds to your debates. You should be grateful I am here.

mrcatsam3(15) Clarified
1 point

"...you're incapable of formulating and introducing an independent subject for rational discourse..."

Yet that statement is paradoxical, as I have formulated and introduced an argument right now. ;)

"...but instead cling leechlike to the subject-matters of others who have contributed positively to the forum by openly stating their viewpoints and presenting them for discussion."

Here's my independent, rational argument I am presenting: You cannot say you have contributed positively to a site's discourse when, if I'm not mistaken, Antrim, you have been banned more than twice for deplorably incorrect and offensive, ad hominem jabs which get you absolutely nowhere.

You're what's known in the debating fraternity as a parasite.

Well, that's just a sign the debating fraternity you've joined doesn't care about anything of substance, because if they did you and your predominantly baseless excuses for arguments would not be allowed.

Your sole reason for infesting this site is to do exactly what I accused Excon of doing.

And what if that accusation is completely wrong?

Clearly you're a resentful little limey pervert who finds sexual gratification in maliciously and futilely trying to condemn those who you recognize as being your intellectual superiors.

It would be admiration I give to those I consider my intellectual superiors. You may have argumentative potential, but your scheme of people-shaming does not show you've got it in the least.

HOWEVER, GRATUITOUSLY SPEWING OUT A LOAD OF MEANINGLESS DRIVEL WHICH HAS NO RELEVENCE TO THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSIONAN HAS ALL THE HALLMARKS OF ONE OF LIFE'S EMBITTERED LOSERS.

Perhaps you wouldn't feel that was the case if you actually read the arguments I propose. Every time I argue with you, no matter how polite I am, you continue to make a show of murdering the debate by removing any relevant matters and resorting to ad hominem attacks.

1 point

For someone who speaks of condemning 'mischievous little provocateurs' your arguments contain many fallacious, empty-handed grabs at 'independent' and 'non-partisan' thought.

Nothing but rhetoric, which belongs in many places, but certainly not in the debate room.

mrcatsam3(15) Clarified
1 point

You're obviously no expert on cigars.

mrcatsam3(15) Clarified
1 point

Well, I'm glad you know what mutually exclusive means. And I'm resting easy knowing you are so unintelligent you tried to insult me by calling me a cigar :|

mrcatsam3(15) Clarified
1 point

Well I've got that too, I'll admit. But explain why you think they are mutually exclusive.

1 point

Unicorns have nuclear rainbow blood. You drink it, your face melts off.

1 point

Aw, psh. Don't disguise yourself, Antrim. You'd be chuffed had it been America.

1 point

You're just as naïve as you sound.

1 point

I think a unicorn would not be naïve enough to think twice about using their horn as self defence against you.

Everyone should despise your definition of self defence.


Winning Position: I'm BACK >=)

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here