CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Nihon

Reward Points:6
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:7
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
7 most recent arguments.
1 point

I don't actually "lik 'em alot" but I just don't have any problems with them. Probably because my grammar isn't terrible. I don't point it out when other people use horrible grammar, but I'm glad that other people do it for me so I don't have to be annoyed by it. So, I guess what I mean is, "Thanks, Grammar Nazis, for making my life easier." ^^

1 point

I think we should be able to decide weather we want the chip or not.

However, the part of my that has watched a million spy/action movies doesn't think this is a good idea. -_-; I mean, what if someone in the government was angry at you (didn't like you view on something or didn't like what you protesting against them) or something and they just went and changed your information to say that you were a wanted criminal or something? And then you had to go to prison for 10 years just because of a dumb chip? Yeah, I'm paranoid....

2 points

I honestly wouldn't find playing "soccer" with my pee to be much fun. I prefer studying interesting material and learning (I will never like tests, though). I find that very fun. So I think it just depends on what you believe is fun.

2 points

Having an obsession with animated porn isn't as awful because it doesn't help the trafficking industry. That still doesn't mean that it's okay to watch it. I'm going to try (probably in vain) to give you an understanding of why it isn't okay: When you watch characters, they're not real. But the emotions being portrayed are the emotions of a human. Not the emotions of a fish or a water bottle. Someone was truly trying to put the real emotions of a real person into that character. So all those reactions and facial expressions you're watching... they're a depiction of a real person and how that person would act. If child in that animated pornography is acting shy or sad or hurt or scared, then they're showing that another human would react as such to this. Meaning that another person would be pained by this, meaning that what you're enjoying is a depiction of someone's pain and all the painful memories that will follow that person throughout their life. If the child in that pornography is acting almost like a grown woman who is "coming onto" the adult, that's even more awful. That depiction is insinuating that it's the child's fault. It's saying that the child wanted it, that the child asked for it, the the child was the one who was responsible for this and not the adult. Society should never excuse an adult, who children are always taught is supposed to be trustworthy and smarter, because a child (who isn't mentally mature enough to comprehend that situation) "started it." Depicting the child as being at fault is absolutely the most horrendous thing anyone could ever possibly imply in animated porn.

So, since all porn depicts real humans with real emotions and even sends specific messages to the viewer about those types of humans, I don't believe that animated child porn is okay either.

1 point

I've met people who act like that. "Don't be so close-minded! Are you against equality or something?!" No. I'm just not into people getting hurt physically or emotionally. Things that cause (directly or indirectly) or have the potential to cause other people physical or emotional pain are never okay and I don't understand how anyone could ever try to excuse themselves for it.

2 points

Woooooooah, there. Watch the broad, sweeping judgements. Factually speaking, Liberals tend to support science more than Conservatives. Science just makes sense. I've always liked logical things. I'm a Liberal. I do not under any circumstances whatsoever think that child porn is acceptable. I firmly believe that it should be completely obliterated from this earth for all eternity. In fact, I would rather see the entire species be killed in payment for these crimes than see one more story of some disgusting pedophile attack a child after years of sitting around in his house jerking off to child pornography and getting more ideas in his mind. ...Then again, I wouldn't mind if they just did away with porn all together, so maybe I'm not a fair judge of what they should do with porn. But it would give people more time to do important things with their lives rather than wasting their time or procrastinating. Anyway, don't just assume that it's Liberals are the cause of all the problems with child pornography. It might feel like a relief to blame something specific that you don't like (such as a political party) but life really isn't that simple.

1 point

There is just so much I could say here. Especially being someone who spent years of their life trying to forget about what happened to me when I was younger. As far as the whole "it's a safe outlet for them" thing... no. Those people don't get better by watching their fantasies happen. It just gives them more ideas and makes them want more things. Honestly, all violent porn that encourages men to be mean, rude, or cruel to children and those who are weaker (physically or emotionally) than them shouldn't be allowed to exist. Instead of going into all this further, I will just show you something about porn that has a direct relation to this topic and is extremely important to this. Here's the article:

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/trends/n_9437/

I believe that this article should be required reading in every high school sexual education class. People really need to understand the effects of viewing explicit material (violent, sexual, or both). For the people in that article, it leads to loneliness and maybe to mistrust, but for sexual predators it can lead to a decreased sensitivity about the feelings of others, making it easier for them to target children and not feel much guilt over it. No one should ever watch child pornography because they're promoting that industry and directly hurting those children. It's the same as doing that to the the child themselves. So, yes. Viewing child pornography is always bad: It's bad when people promote that industry - which directly helps the practice of trafficking to continue - and it's even worse to allow a pedophile, who is obviously at the greatest risk of wanting to enact these things, to watch it (and gather more horrible ideas while becoming even more callous about any victim's or possible victim's feelings).

Nihon has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here