Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 1 |
Debates: | 0 |
It's obvious in the early years of the republic there were organizations that aspired to maintain elite control. Still today they may dream of it, be they (secret Masons), or (Skull and bones) So yes there was an (illuminati) historically. The point is really mute, because the complexity of todays government is so vast that focused elite control is virtually impossible. Recent revelations about quantum theory even speculate that our society is so complex that any elite focused top down control may be out of reach. The question should be "who holds the power"? The active vocal majority holds the power when their efforts are unified, and their purpose is clear. The people united behind a coherent idea are invincible. The largest ship will sink if the captain is sleeping and the storm is sufficiently strong. Aspirations, financial clout, and elite connections do not necessarily mean control. Unified efforts are amorphous, and unpredictable until the fat lady sings.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |