Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 19 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 44% |
Arguments: | 10 |
Debates: | 0 |
Protection is very important to be taught in school, but abstinence should be the focus. Relying on a condom ad education gives kids the authority to have sex freely, and we all know the stats are not perfect. We need to be centered on saving sex to Marriage and build the belief into kids that sex is best to wait, and can be very damaging otherwise.
This is a great topic, one that myself as 100% on, based on how society treats these issues in public, media, etc. Kids know about sex...so we need a strong appeal towards prevention of them becoming active.
It is very simple, Please, both sides read this article.
Really...you are certainly confused. I could not beleive this came from SZ after reading your other ignorant posts.
Read the sentence after (attachment theory) where you argue that these 'developments occur within framework of genetic levels.......yet the rest of your message agrees with social learning impacting future relationships? I quote you "we're born with potential and the environment, and probably chance...help determine what gets filled in and emphasized! Whoa! Thats true!
Thanks for the supporting evidence of Homosexuality (future relationships based on social learning at a young age) being credited to ENVIRONMENTAL factors :)
Oh, the color-blindness is not even in the same category.
|