Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 143 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 95% |
Arguments: | 107 |
Debates: | 9 |
Pharmaceutical immoralities are irrelevant.
This debate is about genetic modification and the fact is that it is immoral to intentionally enslave people to deformity for the rest of their lives.
Goodness, nobody is enslaving anyone. What makes you think genetic modification constitutes slavery? If a particular modification advances to the point that they feel ready to administer it to willing volunteers, slavery has nothing to do with anything. At all.
There is no war? Really?
At the moment there is a war going on in Afghanistan because of religion and human rights (which is exactly what this is about), yet you appear to think that there is no war? Maybe you think that that isn't a war?
The war going on in Afghanistan because of religion and human rights is irrelevant.
This debate is about genetic modification and what its ramifications would be here in the nation where I actually live.
There would be a lot of distaste from certain powerful religions and groups.
I know. I agree. Think of all the things that go on in this country today that blatantly defy certain powerful religions and groups. there are things going on today that receive a lot of distaste from certain powerful religions and groups. It's already happening, yet there is no war.
You're saying genetic modification would be bad because it would piss off certain groups. The fact is that they're already pissed off and nothing's happening.
Little other than experiments in genetic modification would supply us with the information and knowledge we need to perform it successfully.
So be it. That's the way the pharmaceutical industry operates today, so I don't see why you'd suggest genetic modification has to operate any differently.
|