Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

View All

View All

View All

RSS Possum1

Reward Points:37
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
1 point

That would mean an unfixed and unguided path. So that wouldn't really be fate. Unless you mean we make our own.

2 points

That's really difficult to answer. If one was to go back in time say 50 years ago, and changed a major part of our history then that alone would disprove fate as you are changing everyone else's path. However if you have re-written the past it has changed the future and is accepted as our present. As everybody is none the wiser, you could argue that they will see fate in the way they do now, so for them fate does exist. The only person fate would not apply to is the time traveller, maybe giving him the role of a god. So people would continue to believe in fate, but if one person has the ability to change somebodies fate, then it an not exist as an entity in itself. Perhaps the time traveller is then deemed fate.

1 point

Come back to me when a human skeleton is found to be the same age as some dinosaur fossils and i'll admit you're right!

1 point

If you look at my comments my opinions are trying to elaborate on "do evolutionists deny history" not so much whether humans and dinosaurs co-existed. Which they probably didn't if we compare the research for and against.

1 point

Who's to say our version of what dinosaurs looked like is correct? The images we've constructed using a dinosaurs fossils only take us so far. The rest is imagination. How do we know that a t-rex wasn't purple? That they had huge hunches on their backs that actually doubled them over? They could very well of imagined what they would look like. There are too many variables and uncertainties for anybodies opinion to be right or wrong as it's simply guesswork.

1 point

Nooooooo! You didn't even offer me the option of suicide. Well i'm guessing my dental hygiene won't be particurlarly good at this time, so i could use a makeshift flamethrower, replacing the deodrant can with dragon breath!

1 point

I agree whole-heartedly with The Ashman.....Hypocrisy on the highest level.

1 point

I agree whole-heartedly with The ashman. Hypocrisy on the highest level.

2 points

Agreed. The hundreds of millions spent on the "war on drugs" could be put to much better use, not just for addicts, but the country as a whole.

2 points

Agreed. The hundreds of millions spent on the "war on drugs" could be put to much better use, not just for addicts, but the country as a whole.

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Winning Position: No it's a problematic religion

About Me

"I guess i like to debate...."

Biographical Information
Name: Mark 
Gender: Male
Age: 31
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Republican
Country: United States

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here