Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 14 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 93% |
Arguments: | 7 |
Debates: | 2 |
Actually other religions can take a part in this argument. While not a choice, they can show the weaknesses in either Christianity and atheism.
For instance the argument that there had to be a creator because the earth and humans are too complicated can be questioned with why does it have to be a CHRISTIAN god when it can be other gods.
1. It must be hollow because it has never been proven otherwise.
2. The earth is also suspiciously in the shape of a balloon, and balloons are hollow, so the earth must be hollow.
There, two extremely well supported reasons why the earth is hollow.
"If it wasn't for the Arab attack on the jews in 1948, the british mandate of palestine would have been divided into an Arab state and a Jewish state as per the UN plan. Pity they lauched an attack on the Jews which resulted in the latter's victory, followed by the creation of Israel. Not their fault the Arabs attacked them!"
Under that thought then doesn't Tibet rightfully belong to China???
Also why did the UN (which was then mostly controlled by US, Britain, and France) have the right to control who get which land?
I'd like to say a normal no, but the concept of a "war" has changed drastically in recent years. This debate would have been better if their was a goal to the war like take over japan or exterminate the other side or militarily dominate the other country.
Realistically if there was all out war it would just be nukes so there wouldn't really be much of China (nor other countries) left.
If it was a conventional war assuming nuclear weapons didn't exist, I'd assume that Americans goal would be to conquer and turn China into a democratic country similar to what it did (or at least tried to) in Vietnam, Iraq and others.
In that scenario the USA would probably fail, with the huge population of China as well as a pretty solid nationalist population, which would resist foreign takeovers. USA could probably easily destroy most of China's navy and airforce with much ease. The hardest one would be the army, the large army even if badly trained wouldn't be easy for any army in the world to defeat without sustaining heavy losses.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |