Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 3 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
i disagree it was explosives than and its faster firing weapons now its not as easy as video games make it out to be to kill such a large number of people recoil is a big concern and if your a few degrees off its a miss additionally full auto weaponry is very hard to aim when in full auto and is rarely used by any competent soldiers also it was retarded to ban bumps tocks as the shooter would probably have killed more people without one
lets say you have a hundred "militia" members with long range weaponry 99 of them surrender immediately the 1% that doesn't is a huge threat say what you will but it is very hard to avoid being killed today if people really wanted it additionally it acts as deterrent if everybody is armed it keeps politicians scared which is an advantage in and of itself
I think that gun deaths are statistical minority of the about 30,000 gun deaths about 20,000 were suicides 30,000 people are injured by toilets every year and about the same amount of people die in motor cycle accidents additionally that was counting gang shootings and police shooting people also with the types of shootings a lot of people seem to think about pushing people away from guns could be dangerous in and of itself as they will resort to using more effective weapons like explosives.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |