Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS Randomlogic

Reward Points:16
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
1 point

It's not news that Fox has a republican bias. Considering the preposterous allegations, one can conclude that the results were manipulated in order to give the Republican party some favorable light: If the news source flaunts happiness, something that human beings tend to want, and then connects it to the political party it favors, some people will start considering the pro's the party has to offer... maybe even change their political affiliations.

Why appeal to males? We live in a male dominated society. Whether we like it or not, the truth remains that there is no gender equality. Many women would be willing to vote as their husbands do, many women would be willing to vote as their fathers and brothers do. Appealing to men is more effective than appealing to women when it comes to politics, because a male voter can more easily "run the show."

Happiness,. however, comes with a feeling of fulfillment and/or prosperity and, contrary to popular belief, cannot be bought or bargained. The article you posted, considering the source, would not have said that a woman, a child, an immigrant, someone with low income or (much less) a democrat is more likely to be happy.

That an older person is more likely to be happy than an angst ridden teenager, is true. However, sex and political party have nothing to do with it.

1 point

No, sodas are far from good for you. In fact, if I wanted to die, I'd drink cyanide: at least it's faster.

1 point

The image of a Knight in shining white armor counters naught the women's right movement. 'Tis a mere symbol of heroism and protection standing to say that a man has the"obligation" to protect a woman. The women's rights movement has nothing to do with protection, it has to do with equal rights to those of men, earning respect. By saying that the Knight in shining white armor image counters the movement, one would be stating that women are far too proud to need rescuing/protecting/respect. In other words, it is achieving the opposite of what women want. Every being, man or woman needs to feel protected, the image of a parent caring for a child, two old persons taking a walk, the knight in shining white armor and a woman standing beside a man all convey that image of protection.

That the image makes feminists feel undermined is different. Feminists are not the only one's fighting for women's rights, they are they ones that take it to the extreme my seeking Independence from men. My personal believe is that said independence is not necessarily needed since, like I said, no human being can truly stand alone and be happy.

1 point

This is pathetic. If you are enrolled in a school, it is your obligation to go. If you choose not to go, you are disregarding your obligations and thus deserve no credit. Passing everyone in order to hurt no feelings encourages laziness and confirms to the world that Americans expect things handed to them on a silver platter. (Note: it's what I often heard when I went to University)

2 points

It is grammatically correct and to answer your question,

Altruism isn't. Period. The guy at the movie theater? Either way he would have run out. The soldier? has sworn to protect his country and is under oath to do the necessary things to ensure that protection, even sacrificing himself. The soldier (again)? could maybe want to be remembered as a hero, or is so F*ing sick of war that he just wants to end it.

Everything in life has a price, and Altruism is the price of being recognized as a charitable person. Society will tend to overlook a motive if a donation or action is large/important enough.

If you would like me to fill in the blank of your title I'd say: Nothing Is Altruism.

1 point

This is stupid. No, space shuttles are not against god. People should learn to keep religion out of physics.

1 point

I most definitely would not want to be a whale.I'd ask to be turned into a cheetah, or a horse, or an eagle.. but there is NOTHING fun about a whale.

1 point

Hmmm... the most attractive feature in a male is his brain/ ability to banter, reason, articulateness, literacy and culture.

Appealing to the senses, smelling good, having deep eyes and knowing how to dance.

1 point

Okay, you are asking us not to whip out a Bible and quote it as support, yet you are asking us to prove something that is stated in the Bible as foundation for one of many Spiritual doctrines. Historical evidence that a man named Jesus sacrificed himself to save mankind from, what was it again?, oh right! sin is a little blurry, mainly scholarly speculations. So until history does not concretely prove the man's motive and if he was indeed willing to die for mankind, I cannot provide historical proof of whatever argument I make. However, I can make a small inference, if Jesus had indeed sacrificed himself to save us from sin, the Jihad would not be occurring.

and even if he did sacrifice himself I'll ask you to consider the state of the world and answer the following question: was it worth it?

2 points

This is an unfounded debate, it's one of those things that will start going around and around with no true basis of support. There's a word that defines arguing that one religion is better than another: DISCRIMINATION.

There are other religious and spiritual doctrines, not to mention the fact that other people simply choose not to believe... by proposing a two sided debate of "rival religions" you are both encouraging discrimination and discriminating against those doctrines that do not have a place in your debate.

Randomlogic has not yet created any debates.

About Me

Biographical Information
Name: Sabrina Zotis
Gender: Female
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United States
Religion: Atheist
Education: In College
Via IM: imsikizotis
im[email protected]

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here