CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Rebeccaw

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:2
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
2 most recent arguments.
1 point

So you are suggesting that in the event of an attack the streets of Australia should be filled with gun wielding civilians with no training of street warfare, no particular leaders, just whoever fancies killing some people runs about getting into their neighbours crossfire as they shoot from the coffee shop at anyone who moves?

Odd that seems like chaos.

If gun violence went down then thats a step in the right direction for violence overall.

1 point

I can hardly understand how this is not obvious, you have lost an unknown number of normal people today at a cinema screening. That should not be allowed to happen so easily, how can America let it? I have seen comments in the NEWS FEED which suggest that this is not a suprise for the area! My mind boggles, if someone is shot it should be a suprise! If you did not do everything humanly possible to prevent the possiblility that someone with the capacity to kill could have hold of a weapon with that capability then that is ridiculous. If the sacrifice you have to make is to hand over a gun which you cant prove you need for any good reason enough to keep it then that is a small price if it might save one life.

The right to arms is out of date, just because people have them already is a weak excuse, maybe it will take 20 years to get it in order but every year will be a bit safer than the last. If you have a gun in your bag then that suggests you would consider using it, taking a life is a big deal, what if you missed, shot in a struggle through a window, or across the road.

Guns kill because if point your fingers and say bang nobody dies.

If you have a gun to protect yourself its a good bet that your attacker has one too, maybe if they were banned then they wouldnt have one... or so much confidence.

Hand in your weapons because every time someone is shot you know it might just have been prevented.

Rebeccaw has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here