i agree but also it was also to show the soviets and satalin not to expand europ cuz that was there intenshion and the us wouldent let thhis happen. thats how come north korea is a comunist and south korea is where we do bisnes and has a thriving ecomomy

showing the power fo the bomb would be more human way to fource the japinese to surender cuz the japines didnt want to do a land invashion cuz not only would we have lost even more us troops enen more japinese would die cuz the practice bushido and would have killed them selves which would have made the situation even worese

i agree an disagree cuz this is an example of failuer of leadership but at that time it was suspection of espinosh

no cuz rember that japan was the one who bombed perl hearber and were not going to surender and caused tens of thousands of us troopd to die

yes but the japines hade been killing us troops for 4 yearts so that stands ground for the bomb alos cuz japinese troops were not going to surender

i agree to but also the US wanted to scare stalin to keep him from expanding europ

no cu the japines would not surender and the war hade ben goin on for 4 years

'' The atomic bomb must be used as a fource to end the war and strangthen the peace'' quote sayed by president truemen

i belive that option 2 is best cuz it shows the US is serious and givin the enemy a chance to surender