Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 23 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 92% |
Arguments: | 17 |
Debates: | 0 |
It's not the role of any disbeliever to disprove your claim that a god exists. That's absurd.
Are you familiar with the burden of proof? If so, where is your "overwhelming evidence" of god's existence?
So far, much has been asserted - nothing proved.
You seem to have missed my point. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough.
Concerning the issue of abortion - by what right and under what authority does anyone claim the power to deny the fundamental right of an individual to choose for herself? Regardless of the circumstance or whether you agree with her choice.
By the way, kudos for speaking your mind when creating this debate rather than opting for the hackneyed "cutting and pasting." That would be somewhat trite, don't you think?
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able, nor willing? Then why call him God?" -Epicurus
I will add this: To consider humanity "guilty by nature" can hardly be viewed as moral, since doing so invalidates the very concept of morality.
Many may hold that religion is the arbiter of moral rectitude, but the notion of original sin negates that claim outright.
|