Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS Shuvit

Reward Points:23
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

10 most recent arguments.
1 point

Unless she can prove that she is merely an automation whose actions are the result of Google's input, her pursuit of the unearned will be an exercise in futility.

2 points

It's not the role of any disbeliever to disprove your claim that a god exists. That's absurd.

Are you familiar with the burden of proof? If so, where is your "overwhelming evidence" of god's existence?

So far, much has been asserted - nothing proved.

2 points

Evolution is a proven fact.

Creationism fabricates facts to fit the book of genesis.

2 points

You seem to have missed my point. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough.

Concerning the issue of abortion - by what right and under what authority does anyone claim the power to deny the fundamental right of an individual to choose for herself? Regardless of the circumstance or whether you agree with her choice.

By the way, kudos for speaking your mind when creating this debate rather than opting for the hackneyed "cutting and pasting." That would be somewhat trite, don't you think?

2 points

I don't suppose you have any plans to force others to embrace your views at the expense of surrendering their individual right to decide for themselves, do you?

1 point

Any religion that disregards an individuals right to choose, without coercion, condemnation or force, can hardly be considered the source of morality.

1 point

For the superstitious, it depends on which religion is being rammed down their throats.

For the apologist, it depends on how he rearranges his prejudices.

For the theistically impaired, it depends on what others tell him.

1 point

By what right and under what authority does anyone claim the power to disregard the personal choice of another?

Far be it from me to dictate to any woman what she can or can't do with her own reproductive system.

3 points

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able, nor willing? Then why call him God?" -Epicurus

1 point

I will add this: To consider humanity "guilty by nature" can hardly be viewed as moral, since doing so invalidates the very concept of morality.

Many may hold that religion is the arbiter of moral rectitude, but the notion of original sin negates that claim outright.

Shuvit has not yet created any debates.

About Me

Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United States

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here