Dear Brother,

I mentioned about most of the Christians i.e. so called. I know that a real servant of the Lord is not comparable with worldly people. I am sorry if you thought I intended all Christians. Really it was so-called Christians. A real child of Jesus is, by no doubt, extremely peaceful which the world can not describe. Thanks.

Yes, atheists are more peaceful than theists are. The main reason is :

Unlike theists, atheists have no hope after their death. So, they think in their minds "we will have nothing to do after our death; why should we engage in strife..." So, "When a wicked man dies, his hope perishes; all he expected from his power comes to nothing." (Prov 11:7)

On the other hand the theists think in their minds "God is so gracious to us that, He has been forgiving our sins. So, let's us sin..." thus sinning becomes a habit of theists when they see the mercy of God with them. So, Paul's (inspired by God) statement comes to true : "But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound" (Rom 5:20). But the theists forget that, God doesn't want us remain in sin for mercy. "Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?"(Rom 6:1)

If you are a theist, then I would like to put something here for your clarification.

God exists. Christians (myself a Christian) believe, there is God; Muslims believe there is God; Hindus, Buddhist etc. believe there is God. I do not want to argue or tell you, who is God based on religions. But I can say, there is God. He may be Jesus; He may be Mohammad (Allah); Ram, Buddhadev or X, Y, Z, but there is God, no doubt.

And we can not apprehend God since He is outside of time and space. We are limited to time and space. Actually God or what you say Allah created time and space; He is beyond the dimension of time and space. The Bible says that, God's thoughts are higher than that of human beings. So, if we can know all these then we are also God. But that can not be possible. Human mind is so finite that, it can not understand the infinite God. While discussing the atheists I mentioned several time that, it is not possible to store the whole water of the earth in a single teaspoon. It is much more applicable in human mind when we try to understand or imagine about time or space. Because I said we are limited, while God is unlimited. He has no beginning; neither He has end. I advise you not to debate with the atheists, as I came to notice that, when they come to the point of defeat, they use uncivilized words with despair. Do not take you attention when speak against Allah or the Quran or Jesus or the Bible. Because the Bible clearly mentions that only fools say in their heart that there is no God. I hope, similar subject might be in the Quran. Thanks

in this empty space, there was a quantum foam or quantum field of some sort which also always existed (and still exists today). A field of virtual particles constantly popping in

So, how a field of virtual particles came to exist?

The variables regarding the creation of the universe are not known with any certainty, and so, using them as a foundational premise in an argument either for or against God means you can come to a logically valid conclusion and still be incorrect.

That's why said : "No one should deny the existence of God if the one is unable to prove the non-existence of God." Are you ready to prove that there is no God? If you are not able, why you say that, there is no God?

Perhaps nothing. Perhaps another universe or a different version of our own. Perhaps a sea of universes, each with a different set of laws dictating its physical reality.

(I answer this, assuming if it is not one of the defeated atheist coming with different name)

(1) You wrote "Perhaps nothing".

If nothing was before the BigBang, then how the BigBang (say, energy or matter) came into exist?

(2) You wrote "perhaps another universe or a different version of our own"

If another universe or a different version of our own existed before the BigBang, then who created these other universes? If you say, no one created the universes you mentioned, then where did those come from?

(3) You wrote "Perhaps a sea of universes each with a different set of laws dictating its physical reality."

If it is so, then whatever the laws may be or whatever its physical reality will be, how did it come into existence? i.e. who made all these universe with different set of laws than ours?

I said I didn't know that eternal energy was true, but that I believe it

Yes, I said that you believe it. Read clearly before answering it. That's why I always say "atheists are fools"; aren't you? When I said that you believe it, why do you say that I didn't said that and why use to tell things I didn't write it?

...so, your using of the word 'idiot' being not able to answer my questions just reflects your foolishness and despair; disappointment of failing to have the result ChuckHades 1 - 100 sunialpani from ChuckHades 0 - 100 sunialpani.

And as per my policy and the policy of the CreateDebate, there should not the place of using uncivilized words with despair. And this was a scientific debate. I didn't want to have religious debate; because the I do not have enthusiasm while I am always in the winning side. So, I thought you could have scored 1 against 100 in the scientific debate. But here also I find no enthusiasm. I hoped it to be ChuckHades 1 - 100 sunialpani. But it was unchanged. Moreover, you expressed your despair unable to answer my questions. So, as per my policy and the policy of the CreateDebate, I banned you here. I would have continued if you had not expressed your despair with uncivilized words.

I have provided a summary of M Theory

I do not want to write here more. Because other participants in the CreateDebate could read what you wrote about M Theory. So, let people read it and answer if you provided the Summary of M Theory. To your unfortune, you can not edit your post. So, there is no way of escaping. You can not add summary in the M Theory that you just mentioned. I do not astonished at your despair. Because not only yourself, but I see every atheist use to take revenge with uncivilized words after they lose to theists (not only in religious subjects, but in the subjects of science, math, culture etc.) and all these words reflects the backgrounds of your families, not mine.

Of course I'm not sure. It's just the most likely option right now.

You first said that, you believe energy. Next time you said that you are not sure. So, I came to know that you are not sure of things you believe? Therefore, when you say about something you believe is not reliable; because you are not sure about it. Right?

When the question is Please spoonfeed me M Theory because I'm too lazy to look it up myself, then yes.

...so when you are too lazy too mention the M Theory here in CreateDatabase, should it be taken into consideration that you have explained to M Theory to prove your argument? [please note that, explaining M Theory itself is not the answer to my question, but the M Theory must contain the right answer to my question; so, first explain the M Theory here in CreateDatabase and let me see if it explains the desired matter. But sadly, either you are too lazy to put M Theory here or you are getting fear to put the theory as you see nothing in it will be able to explain to have an valid/right answer to my question.)

yes, I do believe energy had no beginning. We are in the infancy of our understanding of a universe beyond our own, and for now, eternal energy is our best guess.

You said that you believe energy had (i.e. has) no beginning. But I ask you - "are you sure, energy has no beginning?"

If you want to know more, there's this thing called "the internet". Use it.

I ask you - "Is it right to refer other web pages or the Internet for our answer(s) to a question in CreateDebate? Please answer either with "yes" or "no"

My guess is that energy itself is infinite

Infinite means, there is no beginning. So, you say, energy has no beginning? Do you believe a something could come to exist without a beginning?

M-Theory is a theory in its infancy, so don't ask for mountains of evidence for it.

Do you think it rational to prove your statement just by saying "M-Theory". You didn't explain what the M-Theory that caused the Big Bang; and do you think it is sufficient just saying "M-Theory" without explaining this? Someone could mention X-Theory without mentioning what X-Theory is; isn't?

We don't know. Assuming there's gravity, then there is space there. But we don't know.

Yes, I honestly accept this answer of yours as you honestly answered it saying that you don't know.

The Big Bang

What caused the Big Bang, since there was nothing before the Big Bang i.e. is the Beginning. What's the force or energy that caused the Big Bang?

Space is 3 of our four observable dimensions

...then what's about the space beyond our observable dimensions?

And what you find is that the area still gives off energy

So, where do the energy come? When did it come to exist?