Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 6 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 93% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
Presidential Appointment powers
While the president can give instructions to the US military, congress can not give orders to anyone else.
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
the President of the United States to nominate and, with the advice and consent (confirmation) of the United States Senate, appoint public officials.
President being able to veto
A veto is the power to unilaterally stop an official action, especially the enactment of legislation.
President has the power to veto acts of congress to prevent the legislative branch from becoming too powerful.
The president has ten days (excluding Sundays) to sign a bill passed by Congress.
The president's decision not to sign the legislation is a pocket veto and Congress does not have the opportunity to override.( they could by ⅔ but has never happened)
The president controls all executive orders
The law doesn’t require approval from congress.
Executive Order 9066, which delegated military authority to remove any or all people in a military zone.This was a United States presidential executive order signed and issued during World War II by United States president Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942.
Congress may try to overturn an executive order by passing a bill that blocks it, but the president can veto the law.
Federalist wanted no bill of rights because they believe that your freedom and that your rights are limited. “Federalist viewed the Bill of Rights as a “parchment barrier” that an overly powerful government or a tyranny of the majority could easily and most likely crumple up.” Federalist thought to keep a more organized government was not to have the Bill of Rights. This meaning that they thought that having a Federalist government would be easier than having to follow the laws that the anti-feds were to have. Having the Bill of Rights would start a democracy.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |