I completely agree. Iran keeps majority of its fund in bonyads. These bonyads keep money stored for anything the supreme leader wants. So, the money does not go back into the economy. If we continue to give $150 billion dollars to Iran, we are continuing to support terriosm, state-wide and global.

The biggest problem with the Iran Nuclear Deal is that it is a temporary fix for a long term problem. The deal gives the US about ten years of no nuclear warfare, but we all know that there is not a real diplomatic relationship between the US and Iranians. This deal is more of a way to appease the Iranian government. Moreover, Iran would receive long term benefits for such a short term fix.

The younger generation of Iran is unable to have any real say in their government. While they have the ability to vote, candidates are all vetted by the religious clergy. This means this "more educated" population have no real say in what truly happens in Iran.

Iran has a radical, theocratic government that can not be trusted. While their government does have elected presidents, their presidential candidates are vetted by a theocratic-driven group of people who work for the supreme leader. The supreme leaders have been seen as against anti-western, like Khomeini who was in charge of the American hostage crisis. Also, they do support the idea of going to war, as we have seen with the Iran-Iraq War. The young, liberal people of Iran does not have any real say in who runs their government either. The government is controlled by one religious authoritarian.

Even though we cannot deny the fact that Iran has normal citizens and a young population of people, we can not throw a blind eye to the fact that those people would not even receive the funding that Iran would receive when sanctions are lifted. The money would go to bonyads and to the Revolutionary Guard. The assets that they would receive would not even benefit the citizens of Iran because it would be used to fund terrorists groups and other things that they see fit to resist westernization. Moreover, the Iranian government is a theocracy, therefore, the people do not have much of a say in their government. --CW

The nuclear deal lifts economic pressure off of Iran. If US, UN, and EU sanctions are lifted, it puts more money in Tehran. They would use this money fund terrorist groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. Iran funds Hezbollah to harass the Isralei people in Lebanon. They do this because they want to resist westernization, and this also harms our Isralei allies. Why lift economic pressure when they are against westernization? --CW

While the Nuclear Deal allows us to have inspections, Iran is able to block the inspections from occurring allowing them to hide stuff from our country. Iran has the right to challenge the need for a surprise inspection. This gives Iran a window of 24 days before the inspector is able to legally come and inspect. During this time, Iran will be able to hide any suspicious equipment and nuclear weapons that they are in the progress of building. Also, if Iran is able to follow the deal for 10-15 years, Iran will have the time frame they need to build a nuclear weapon without having to take out funding from the countries. The time they need is about a year, especially if they have been storing uranium and cleaning it during their 10 years of following the agreement.

Choosing to support the Nuclear Deal will allow Iran to have more money to fund national terroism. Iran is the biggest funder for global terroism, for groups such as ISIS. Iran, also, has executed more people than anyone, including China. Iran has executed more than 1000 Americans. The Nuclear Deal says how countries, including America, will give Iran $150 billion dollars for any use. Also, Iran has blatantly said how they wish to eliminate Israel, an ally and asset of America. So, if we choose to give $150 billion dollars to Iran, we are possibly ensuring the demise of Israel and the increase in global terroism.

Congress can stop or slow down executive agreements that the President issued. Congress can tell another country to not approve a President’s agreement. Congress can trial the President for impeachment in case the agreement was for Presidential gain. Congress can create laws that block the treaty in some way. Congress is more powerful because they can slow down the President's ability to create executive agreements.

Congress can has power over the bureaucracy to slow them down or stop them. Congress can cut funding to federal agencies and that agency will die. Also, Congress can impeach members of the agencies. Another thing, Congress has the power to override regulations made, by the bureaucracy, that they do not approve of, or if they feel like it has a purpose that gives an advantage to certain people. Lastly, Congress is in charge of approving agencies. That is why Congress has power to hurt the bureaucracy giving them more power than the President.