Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 71% |
Arguments: | 6 |
Debates: | 0 |
Iraq was to blame.
The middle wastern community felt that Saddam's invasion should be dealt in arab context instead of the western. Saudi Arabia hence submitted a proposal for Iraq to withdraw peacefully and still acclaim victory. Kuwait also had to gave away 2 islands to Iraq that were blocking their limited access to sea areas. However, Saddam himself wanted to gain something for this deal and refused to spare an attack on Kuwait. Thus it is evidently quite clear that Saddam was to blame.
OVERCROWDING
Japan was becoming increasingly crowded due to its limited size as a nation and its rapidly increasing population. Mahuria offered nearly 200,000 square kilometres which would easily accommodate any over-spilling population.
LACK OF RESPECT FOR THE CHINESE
One of the side reasons that motivated the conquest of Manchuria was the low opinion the Japanese had on the Chinese. No thought was given to the Manchurian people whatsoever.
REBELLIOUS ARMY
The League at China ordered the Japanese army to withdraw. Japan’s delegates at the League’s headquarters in Geneva did agreed to this and the Japanese government in Tokyo also agreed to this demand. However, the army did not listen and it launched a full-scale invasion of Manchuria and by the end of 1931, it had occupied the whole of the province. The civilian government had clearly lost control of the army, and theLeague’s position was that it would deal with the government of the aggressor nation. But how could this succeed when the government had no control over the army which was the cause of the problem ?
Even though Stalin improved the economy and production rates of various goods and items, a lot of human lives were lost in the process. Sacrificing so many people (est. 40 million deaths) is definitely not worth it. He was also not satisfied with the results, consistently trying to push people to increase production rates and threatening and killing people who oppose or didn't meet his target. Hence, human-wise, he failed to provide a comfortable life for his citizens, which was contrary to what a leader should be providing.
General Percival is ordered to do what he has to do like to turn the defences to the seaward. He personally wanted to put the defences to the North and he was only granted permission to do that before the day of the Northward assault by the Japanese. He also cared about the welfare of his citizens and probably the surrender was his last contribution to the Singapore.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |