CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Wesmont

Reward Points:1
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:1
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
4 points

You are incorrect, there is lots of scientific evidence that supports the big back theory, which is why scientific consensus throughout the world has made it the accepted theory of how the universe began. To actually get into detail and explain the evidence in support of the theory would just confuse most people, and often does, which leads to the commonly held belief by laypeople that it's an unfounded theory without any actual proof to support it. Additionally, the argument that the consensus of the scientific community is some kind of conspiracy in academia is similar to saying that the U.S. government planned the 9/11 attacks and are covering it all up..... it's just what it sounds like, a crazy conspiracy theory. You can't go blaming the media either, they have no real interest in supporting the theory. You're just reacting to the fact that the dominant theory threatens your world view. I could easily take your statement and replace the words "BB Theory" with "existence of God" and replace the word "science" with religion (and vice versa). You might think that such an event as the big bang is totally irrational, but there IS scientific data and logically derived conclusions that have convinced many very educated, very smart people that it is THE most plausible theory... however, there is no empirical evidence that God exists. As is clear from your statement, the argument for His existence is that "every other theory is impossible/unprovable so it MUST be his work." I could say the same about aliens from another dimension or magic, surely you wouldn't admit that they also could have created the universe or life on this planet? You are the one who is too stubborn to accept to accept such a simple explanation that the universe appeared out of no where, and that a tremendous amount of energy came out of what seemingly was nothing at all (similar to how splitting a single atom produces the greatest amount of energy humans have so far been able to produce). By no means does this mean you are wrong to have faith... but that's what religion and belief in God is, faith, and you shouldn't go asking for or offering proof for God's existence, faith is the only thing that matters in that regard. Science, however, is based on empirical evidence and the scientific method, and you obviously are throwing out blanket statements about a theory you don't fully understand. If you did, you would know that there is plenty of proof to support it, and it would not be the dominant theory and have the support of the world scientific community if there was none.

Wesmont has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here