Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 0 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 83% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
All i heard from that song was red rings red rings red rings red rings red rings red rings red rings red rings red rings red rings red rings red rings neglect to mention all the games xbox has and only say like 10 of your titles, plus most of it was filled in by the original song's music, to make it seem longer and have more about it, so don't YOU have any shame (whoever made that song) to be completely biased. The PS3 song was legitimate and did not sware a bunch of times to sound like big boys made it.
First of, the Xbox 360 only costs a few cents over 4 dollars a month (for a much better online experience) and ps3 fans say it has less games, but thats because the developers actuly take the time to make the gameing experiance better on that game instead of moving on to the same genaric shooter, marval, or platform game, over and over. And if you have a ps3 and you actually want to make use of the fact that it has more games (not including marketplace games of corse) then you have to actually buy the games, in which case a little over 4 bucks a month would seem like a no brainer, to be able to have fun with only a few games. Another big agrument is that the ps3 plays blue ray. You people out thare who think that counts as a feture are stupid. It PLAYES blue ray yes, but it only plays it as a DVD, that "feture" is just so if you have useless blue ray disks laying around, you can actually play them, but only in DVD quality. And yes the games CAN fit more data, but all of the developers working for sony, are too stupid to utilise that.
Another big debate is that ps3 games have better graphics, this is only true if you you count that ps3 games are all 75% somewhat good graphic cutscreens and only 25% actually gameplay. And now for a bit of logic. Xbox(1) had free online and the same fetures (exept for a much better mic system) than the ps2. and so if sony's socond title was worse then Microsoft's first title, then how do you think the 3rd and 2nd gen. titles are gonna stack up. (and some of you out thare say play station had less time to develope, WELL HOW PRAYTELL ARE THEY ON THARE 3RD TITLE FIRST!) Thare we go.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |