Additionally, such types of work do not have harmful influence on women's health and they are able to have a baby.
I disagree with this statement. Because There is also the problem of pregnancies, definitely when "enlisted pregnancy rates jumped from 12 to 19 percent" (Donnelly) in only the past two years. Having combat situations jeopardized because a woman finds out she is pregnant during an extended combat mission would be totally counterproductive to any benefits. There is also the problem of soldiers who don't know they're pregnant yet who might put unnecessary stress on the unborn child in the most fragile early stages of the baby's life.
I don't think women should be forced into combat situations. I agree they weren't built for it emotionally or physically. If a woman wants to do it and the Army doesn't have a problem with it, I wouldn't forbid it, but I'm afraid once it's not against the rules women who don't want to be in combat may be forced to be. This will be especially bad if the draft is re instituted. I think mothers, especially, shouldn't be in combat zones, especially if their children are young. I think children need to have their mothers around during those years. It's one thing to be a working mom. It's another to be working on the other side of the world where you can't be home for the kids at night.
Women were made to be nurturers not fighters.
I can't even imagine why a woman would want to be in a combat role. There are too many differences between men and women for the roles to even be equal. Men were made to be stronger than women. Not that women are weak but in a combat situation I would trust a man to be able to fight and kill an enemy more than I would a woman. Today's world has turned upside down the roles of men and women. Women deserve equal pay and status in the business world but in war and combat women need to allow the men to be men.
Women should not be able to serve equal combat roles as armed forces because we need women in the world to do other things.
I believe that women should not be able to serve equal combat roles as men because there might be a shortage of women around the world. Already in China, there is an unequal ratio of men to women, and we need women to keep our human population going. Also, women need to be able to produce babies for this reason, and the only way they could do that is if they are 18+ years old. If a women decides to go fight the same combat roles as men in a time of war, we will lose a percentage of women worldwide, it is not like after the war only 10 women will die throughout the time of war.
Any woman that chooses to fight for her country should be allowed to do so.
We live in a country that stresses equal rights for women and minorities. That should encompass all aspects of life. It is unfair for women to be discriminated against because of archaic values. If a woman wants to go into battle to defend her country, then she should be allowed. The actual combat is to protect citizens, such as these women. They should be able to fight for themselves, if they want.
you said that video games it's also has more negative sides as violence on tv. but May be for children's development sometimes they need it. i agree with you. Video Games do provide opportunities for players to develop and practice critical thinking skills. As librarians and educators we have the ability to use these developing skills to build a bridge from these gaming skills to educational and academic ones. I believe that playing video games develops critical thinking, especially when they play strategic game like DOTA. For example Youngsters think critically and improve their critical thinking. While playing DOTA, people have to think about their strategy having to create an army and conquer other realms. By doing these things, youngsters improve their critical thinking. And also i agree with you that we should control it and limited time for video games.
Today’s people more and more want to watch so many action films which consist of much act of violence and play different ruthless video games that destroy psychology of children. However, if we loot at on this on the other hand, Violence on TV shows real life and action films are interesting. Many people believe that violence on TV and video games harms children by making them more aggressive, but I disagree with them. According to the Jessica Lyons “TV violence teaches children that the incidents they watch are a "legitimate response" to similar types of situations they encounter in real life”. I think violence on TV learn children for perception of the world such as it is. Because young people think that violence on TV shows really life. When children watch only good films and cartoons they can’t imagine that our life is full of violence, and by watching action films they know that our life is full of violence. We see different peoples, who have watched violence on TV very often, and who haven’t watched. Those people who have watched horror, thrillers in the childhood, they can be aggressive very often, but they are realists. Other people, who haven’t ever watched horrors, and always watched cartoons, they are always optimistic, but they don’t think like realistic people.
