CreateDebate


Charlenetan's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Charlenetan's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

You are confusing Digital intimacy with actual intimacy. It is proven that people often overestimate how close they are to each other in social media. this can cause us to lose real friends

1 point

Another study shows that in social media, people often create their own idealize persona to make up for what they are lacking in the real world.

1 point

I said proofread, of course you cannot delete what that has gone out. But people can proofread the chat before they send it. If they do not want to reply, they could always say afk

3 points

From a survery, 24% of respondents said they’ve missed out on enjoying special moments in person because they were too busy trying to document their experiences for online sharing. Social media made them forget to live their life to the fullest instead of taking a picture perfect shot of themselve eating their lunch

0 points

But social media makes us inable to interact face to face when the time comes for such an occasion. In social media, we can proofread our chat and delete it or edit is as we see is necessary. In real life, once the words comes out of your mouth, there isn't a way to get it back. Thus social media can actually make us less social

2 points

To make a company strong, you need a good leader, but why not have two good leaders instead of one? One to plan, one to understand want people wants. WHy couldn't Raffles work with him instead of wasting his potential? To me, that is a real waste of human resources.

1 point

And how did the message get across? They don't have telephones then. Raffles also wasn't there to observer Singapore, it was all Farquhar reports to keep him updated.

3 points

So...... Let me put this in another way, an SST teacher signs a treaty with another school, that means he/she is the principle?

1 point

The funds weren't sufficient thus Farquhar has to resort to other means to build Singapore.

1 point

So then the malays are the rightful founder of Singapore. The malays set foot in Singapore first.

1 point

Raffles accused him of being too close to the local population, which should be how a good leader be, close to his subjects thus he can know what his people need.

1 point

there athen if that is the case, the malasian are the rightful founder of Singapore because were in Sinagpore first!

1 point

You can anyhow take a good plan out just to show you are better.......... Raffles must have taken some ideas from the orginal plan

1 point

Farquhar had useful contacts with the Malaysian and knows more about the Asians while Raffles was still thinking more British



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]