This is about nudism not sex. A quick google search will give you definitions both. Also, no one here is suggesting that there should be a 180 flip to the law where they now ban clothes. All it is asking if you would accept it and not discriminate against it. Just because people will be allowed to go naked without fear of discrimination from the law and society does not mean their brains will now malfunction to the point where they can not tell that is cold out.

One could use the same arguments against a whole list of things that have been discriminated against in the past but now aren't. In Canada, we used to discriminate against homosexuality but now it is wholly excepted. People and society can and do change - some a little faster than others.

So, if the sight of something displeases you, you think it should be illegal? Should this be the basis for a law? I don't like the look of that group of people -- throw them all in jail!

Would you feel the same if the law said that you couldn't wear clothes except for safety reasons? This issue is about baseless discrimination so it is an injustice.

Seeing a human body does not cause harm to other humans so why should it be criminal and unacceptable for one human to walk around without clothes in public. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever to make the human body a criminal act (the severest type of punishment under our laws). This law (in Canada) is only there for so called moral reasons. It is not there to protect the public from any harm. In Canada it was created for a specific purpose that has long past. It is also a form of discrimination just like not accepting gay people or jewish people. Allowing naked people to roam the earth doesn't mean you would see naked people everywhere you go. Private businesses can currently have dress codes. This wouldn't change if people were allowed to be naked in public.