Does Debate.org have any integrity?
Debate.org seems to let small mobs rule what happens. A user there named Qopel, got vote bombed over and over. In his frustration he tried to fight back, and in return he got petitioned to put him "on trial". When it was pointed out that those who wanted to put him on trail did worse than what Qopel did, "YYW" responded, "Irrelevant. Even if his actions were acts of reciprocity, they were still harmful to the site."
So, the integrity of debate.org only matters when it comes to certain people. Double standards do not create integrity.
Debate.org has no integrity.
Yes
Side Score: 12
|
No
Side Score: 17
|
|
|
|
Just because you guys got kicked from the site it doesnt mean it doesnt have any integrity, it just means that its too classy for you two to be allowed in. Just about everyone here on createdebate could go to DDO and be welcomed with open arms, many of them wont but still, the door is open. You two though (Qopel and whatever RM is hiding as these days) caused so much trouble you had to be kicked from the site because you were too stupid to be kept around.... DDO may have slipped over time in terms of integrity, but it certainly still has some even though you cant bring yourselves to admit it ;) Side: Yes
|
The following users are vote bombers on debate.org: stubs, Ragnar, Misterscruffles, 1Devilsadvocate, 1Historygenius, adontimasu, Albert, AlwaysMoreThanYou, Anaxa, Apeiron, badbob, BennyW, BigSky, BillyTheKids, CharlieWBC, Chicken, ConservativePolitico, Consummator, DakotaKrafick, DoubtingDave, Dylip, Illegalcombatant, imabench, ishallannoyyo, IwinYoulose333, joseph.bazemore, just4trollz, KeytarHero, kingsjester, Korashk, KRFournier, lannan13, likespeace, lit.wakefield, Logic_on_rails, makhdoom5, MrVan, Nur-Ab-Sal, philochristos, po.osullivan, popculturepooka, ProfessorCNut, Ragnar, robertqiu, rross, samurai, SANTORUM2012, sbaik610, Smithereens, thett3, Typhlochactas, wiploc, x2MuzioPlayer, YYW, Zaradi, zezima Side: No
|