CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:2
Arguments:2
Total Votes:2
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 The System of Political Parties Is Completely Obsolete (2)

Debate Creator

JaceCarsonne(93) pic



The System of Political Parties Is Completely Obsolete

The last election has proven one thing: It doesn't matter which political party you identify with. The person dominating the race in your political party will not always reflect the ideals that fit your schema. Bernie Sanders, for example, once considered himself an independent candidate. Knowing quite well that he would never have a shot at the presidency if he didn't identify himself one way or another, he chose to call himself a Democrat in the recent election. On the other side, I'm sure there is a record percentage of Republicans that were NOT happy that Trump was picked to represent them. 

This day and age, there are Conservatives who believe that abortion should be legal. There are Liberals who don't believe that transgender people are justified. There are Conservatives who believe marijuana should be legalized. There are Liberals who believe that capital punishment/the Death Penalty should be instated in American law. The political stereotypes that we associate so heavily with each party do not exist as they once did. 

Removing the party system would further entice the American people to vote based on ideals, plans, personality, and intelligence, rather than "They're a Republican/Democrat, and I'm a Republican/Democrat, so I'm voting for them." 

The political party system (especially this day and age) has merely shown itself to be another way to divide the American people. If you honestly think about it, there is no reason for the political party system to exist. There are, however, reasons why it should not exist. 

- The Third Party candidates represent a faction of individuals who veer slightly outside of the main ideals of the Republican v. Democrat party (but still veer slightly to the left or the right.) None of these independent candidates have ever come close to winning the presidency, five third-party candidates in history have won more than 10% of the popular vote, and merely eight of them have won any electoral votes at all. 
- Too many people only vote for a candidate because of "Republican" or "Democrat" next to their name. They don't look closely enough at their ideals or what they would actually DO as President. (Do you think half of the Republicans in the previous election would have voted for Trump if he wouldn't have called himself a Republican?) The party system has turned the American public into mindless partisan identifiers. 
- Something that profoundly divides the country is whether or not you're a liberal or a conservative. The ideals that we assume an individual holds based on their political preference causes turmoil within human relationships long before a conversation can even be struck up (as I mentioned above in my second paragraph). 

Should the Political Party system be abolished? Has it run its course, and is it time for American to try something new? 

Or should it remain this way, in hope that things will one day change? 
Add New Argument

I think the parties are beginning to phase themselves out. Their monopolies have simply forced them to morph into third parties under the guises of Republican and/or Democrat. The old Democrats would have never censored speech. The New "Democrats" will censor in a heartbeat. The old Republicans would have never allowed gay marriage. The New "Republicans" simply don't care.

1 point

Completely agree. In fact in the information age it should be so easy for both candidates and the voting public to be able to get and share what they need to know to vote people in or out regardless of party. The only things standing in the way of that are voter ignorance/apathy as well party choke holds on every component of the election process.

Here's an interesting thing to wrap your mind around. What if a Constitutional Amendment were passed somehow to ban any and all party associations and make everyone run or vote based on individuals? What would happen then?

Well, first of all you'd see a rush for people to identify what they believe in. Where they stand on almost every issue.

Then you'd see apps and websites to help people navigate that information.

And then you'd see (most likely - not guaranteed) a new level of voter involvement as people have to actually work to decide whom they're voting for.

Why don't we have that?

Oh, I know why. Because of the choke hold of the Republicans and Democrats, as well as stupid bipolar politics in this country as exemplified by the extremists on this site.