It is better to jump into a fight once you know who is going to win and the person you want to lose is already tired and a little beat up ;)

I think it was mainly just following the advice of George Washington when he told us not to get involved in Europe's affairs and tangled alliances.

There were also millions of immigrants in the country from both sides of both wars at the time, so the US taking sides at first would cause an uproar.

I don't know about WWI, but I believe for WWII Congress was totally against going to war, while FDR really wanted to enter into the war. The only reason he got his way was because of the attack on Pearl Harbor. That single event changed the minds of the Congressmen.

The bank saw England close to losing and funding both sides they saw the end of their ill gotten gains. America was pro Germany at the start of the war but the bank owned media started an anti Germany champaign that shifted American view as they did during the 2008 election as most, including Obama supporters, now realize.

The bank has played both sides since the French Revolution. Federal Reserve Bank, the Bank of England, and all the others are owned by a select few who have more money than they could ever spend but still crave more These men are guilty of crimes worse than murder and genocide. They just don't take life but destroy life and thrill in doing so.

Why would the US jump right into a World War? They're terrible things. And by the way people, WWIII is right around the corner

USA got better things to do than participating in both world wars.