That isn't how burden of proof works. You are required to substantiate your claims in debates, and you appear to be making an appeal to emotion to support what would otherwise be an extremely weak argument.
Appeals to emotion are all that libs use though.
Yes I have
It's obvious that you didn't.
and not only is it considerably more reasonable, but it is a ridiculous attempt to deflect the point.
Obama's was worse & even consisted of members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Attacking the Democrats does not make the Republicans any less corrupt.
Both are corrupt. That's why both are trying to destroy Trump, the outsider.
If I criticised baseball, would you attempt to defend it by attacking football?
Your comparison makes no sense. Obama & Trump would be players playing the same sport.
"Theresa May’s husband is a senior executive at a $1.4tn investment fund that profits from tax avoiding companies
Exclusive: May mentioned Amazon and Starbucks in speech about tax avoidance"
hiring Wall Street criminals
You've never looked at Obama's administration and connections list.
