Yes, actually there is. People eat bugs. If you go online and find the right site. You can order anything from beetles, to tarantulas. When my friend ordered some out of a dare they came out of a metallic container.
We are just beginning the path of cloning. Cloning and genetic engineering are hand in hand. Once we master cloning then we can begin genetic engineering.
Do please tell me just how close we are to genetic enhancements in human DNA?
That could be possible. But that's still a few hundred years away from our current technology.
That... Is reasonable, but there are some guarantees in life. For instance, we need oxygen to live. That's a guarantee.
Secular because there is no God. But it is a theory, not proof. I needz proof.
Oh and also, I wasn't talking about the debates topic, I was talking about the topic Jolie and I were debating. The reply you made to me was totally off topic of what we were discussing.
I can very much so express my frustrations without cursing, as I am now. But with very far right conservatives like FromWithin who couldn't care less about the poor, and he is very stubborn and very belligerent (but I can't say that I'm any better).
Are you going to remain on topic or rant about the fact that I curse? I don't whine I just explain its a bad habit.
Nothing can beat out the laws of physics. In the big bounce; our expanding universe will contract rather than expand into the near future. Which will cause all matter to be brought down to the size of an atom. But maybe, just maybe that will create enough energy to recreate the universe. In the big rip; our universe will expand so much that things will begin to rip apart, atom by atom. This will cause the destruction of all matter. I don't think we can beat that, even at a god-like level.
But in point number 3 the ENTIRE universe gets destroyed.
But in my theory the energy that is created from the destruction will create another Big Bang.
True... But assuming your an atheist, the likeliness of that is almost 0% chance of happening. Because of a few reasons...
1. In about a million years the sun will be too close and too hot for life to be on earth.
2. In about two million years the sun will engulf earth.
3. In a couple billion years the entire universe will be demolished.
(Big rip, big freeze, big bounce, etc)
I personally don't think that is true. Now when we complete EVERYTHING then life would be meaningless. We still have all of outer space to explore, we still have the oceans to explore, we still have new technology to be made, we still have world peace to create, we still have poverty to lower, we still have friends and family. Do you see my point?
And don't forget that he pulled the creation of their MAJOR advantage of the Russians which was their Assault rifle.
For the first two or three years. After that he was really dumb. Look it up.
Ooooooh okay his link doesn't seem to do much on that topic...
Hmm well I saw that idea as the only realistically possible and the others, such as banning guns and such seem very unrealistic and will likely never happen. Especially in Texas.
Just normal Google, not Google chrome (if it's different then norm Google.).
Obama's gun control/restrictions
That is what I used.
Hmmmmm.....
I use(d) Google, all I saw was magazine limits for automatics.
I can't give link evidence because I can't copy links....
But if you look it up you will find it.
Obama said and Obama tried are two totally different things. Obama talks about everything. But only attempts a small percentage of those things.
Your reading off of a false article. Obama doesn't want to ban guns he just wants to make there a magazine limit of automatics. Something every single republican president has attempted to do since Reagan.
As much as I hate FromWithin for those exact reasons. I also hate people who curse out like that (it makes no sense...).
Correction: Something every Republican president has tried to do since Ronald Reagan.
All Obama is trying to do is make a magazine limit for automatic weapons. Something every republican president has done since Ronald Reagan.
Very true at that as well, but if I'm correct, we are only half way done with the life cycle of the universe. A lot can happen in that time period. But hell, we won't be here to see it (the sun will engulf earth wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy (like billions/trillions of years) before that happens).
I believe that the Big Bang occurred to a reoccurring cycle of collapsing and expanding of the universe. The energy that is created when that occurred allowed the Big Bang to occur sometime after. It will happen again sometime into our future.
My parents haven't sworn a day I've known them. But since I do, and get it from my grandfather's side (a generational curse or some shit like that) I can't help myself when I'm angry.
How is it that you can be racist until the age of 18 but have racism not exist?
It is called Racism if they hate them for the color of their skin.
But it is called racist, racism and ethnocentrism are two different things.
We are all one human species. Race is a further more categorization which is based off of skull structure and skin tone mainly.
Ma'am, there is scientific evidence that there is multiple races. As shown below, it is not racist to say so. We are a normal species like every other animal. Now it does become racist if you treat one race higher than the other.
Ma'am, there is scientific evidence that there is multiple races. As shown below, it is not racist to say so. We are a normal species like every other animal. Now it does become racist if you treat one race higher than the other.
Most people don't know what Walmart does, and what do you expect us to do? Starve?
Being an Atheist I don't abide by religious text and would ask for something other then a verse.
Caucasion:
Skull: Dolicephalic(Long-Head),High forehead,Little supraobital development.
Face: Mainly Leptoproscopic( Narrow)Sometimes Meso- or even Euryproscopic, Neither Facial nor alveolar prognathism occurs except among some archaic peoples.
Nose:Long,narrow,high in both root and bridge.
Mongoloid:
Skull: High incidence of Brachycephaly(Short Round Head)
American Indians while Mongoloid are often Dolicephalic.
Foreheads slightly lower than that of the Caucasoid.
No Supraobital development.
Face: Wide and short, projecting cheek bones, Prognathism rare. Shovel shaped incisors common especialy in Asia.
Nose: Mesorine(Low and Broad in both root and bridge.
Negroid:
Skull: usually Dolicephalic, a small minority are Brachycephalic.
Forehead most often high, little supraobital development.
Face: Leproscopic (to a much lesser degree than the Caucasion), Prognathism common in most Negro populations.
Nose: Low & broad in root and bridge with characteristic depression at root.
Now these are only the most common races. There are many more than just this.
A race is a scientific category for the Homo sapiens (the current and only living species of human), which narrows down things further.
Holy hell, you just found my school.
Turns to mother
"MAM WE ARE MOVIN"
If it is for cost reasons: Just get a pistol and put a 10¢ bullet into the man/woman's head.
Look and read my argument and it might change your mind (about the fact that he is a capitalist that is).
Ah, so we have a narrow minded, selfish, conservative? Only thinking he matters and not others? We need to be touchy when it comes to what we call people because words can cause issues. Hell, look around you! Look at how many teenagers and adults and even young children are committing suicide because of words. Nothing more and nothing less than words. Are you really going to risk harming someone like that? How do you know if they are emotionally stable? And the words issue is, we use those words as insults. Back in the day when everyone was even mannered and didn't insult people for the fun or for the sport of it, it was okay to use those words. But now they are used as insults and the sooner you come to that reality the better. This is coming from a previous bully and bullied.
Yes I knew it wouldn't be the miracles but I didn't know they knew what he did.
To call anyone a minion is rude. We might as well call you a minion of the right in that case.
I meat social class. We should all be equal and no one be considered above the other.
We have historical evidence of Jesus? I knew that we knew he was a person but we have evidence of what Jesus did?
1. The left does not refer to the poor as minions. Just because the poor tends to vote for the left because they can give them a future does not mean that we are their "minions". Conservatives refer to the poor as the minions of the left.
2. Most poor people can never have a future is for the following reasons if capitalism stays.
~Without healthcare if they are injured, they are screwed.
Socialism: Healthcare to all (including the wealthy).
~They can scarcely go to college due to their lack of money.
Socialism: Free education to all (including the wealthy).
~If they are disabled, chances are they will have trouble finding a job.
Socialism: Disability and Unemployment tax.
Do you read your own posts?
Censorship is located where in the 1st Amendment ? I would like you to show me that !*
He never brought up religion nor the first amendment, the first amendment is all about religion so thus you brought up religion.
But a Christian is a Christian, wether socialist or capitalist or liberal or conservative. They all read and follow the bible. I should know because I was a previous Christian for a long time.
But the bible is the bible, both Christian capitalists and Christian socialists use the bible am I correct?
Nowhere, your the one who brought up religion by bringing up the first amendment.
I know that is why I typed "By God". I don't believe in God, but I see too many Christian capitalists saying that Socialists should go to hell.
I'll say it again: Class Warfare, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing.
Correct, that is what Socialism is for.
The talking heads on the left are constantly demonizing successful people in an effort to stir up the resentment and envy of their minions.
Oh wow, hypocriticalness right off the bat. The very fact you called us poor people "minions" (because I myself am quite poor) is demonizing the poor.
But, what good is accomplished by hating successful and accomplished folks?
What good comes from calling the poor minions? Or thinking we all live off of welfare and sit around and never work?
Aren't successful people worthy of emulation, rather than condemnation?
Aren't the poor, who cannot have a future if capitalism stays worthy of emulation?
Perhaps class warfare assuages that natural tendency in some people (liberals) to hate those who have because they have not? I just don't think it's a philosophy that will serve them well in life.
Perhaps the philosophy of the right is to that
1. All of the poor wants to live off of welfare
2. All of the poor can somehow magically make money appear
3. All of the poor are lazy and never work.
So, which is it with you? Do you consider them worthy of emulation, or worthy of condemnation*
Neither, each class should be equal in everything. Hell, there should never be class at all.
Okay sorry wrong wording, God told man what to write into the bible according to Christians.
1. Why did you bring up the first amendment if nobody mentioned it.
2. No, it does not only pertain to religion but it includes religion.
Okay, so if your not lying Andy will say that he deleted posts from Cuaroc and Atrag where they called you a rapist? Is that correct?
Wow aren't you an idiot! Is was a rough estimate! Estimate and Assumption have two different meanings.
You cannot censor religion, nor can you enforce religion. That is what the 1st amendment is all about you dipshit.
But if the bible is written "by God" than wouldnt that mean that God is a socialist?
Is that admitting your lying? I still think that possibly you are correct.
No it is a rough estimate! Also go to my Is God a socialist debate to show you that God is a socialist.
So
1. Your telling me that if I ask Andy if he deleted posts by Cuaroc or Atrag that said that you were a rapist he would say yes? If he does say yes (because I've already asked) than I am so so so sorry and I hope you can forgive me. If he says no than your lying and that makes you a liar.
2. Way to come on belligerent. I called you a liar because I could tell by your defensive style that you were possibly and most likely lying.
XD, That could happen possibly. Or I could ask Andy if he ever deleted posts about you or Atrag calling her a rapist...
It is based off of a rough estimate. I would say socialist and capitalist Christians are about 50-50... Just go to your local city and ask people if they are Christian and if so are they capitalist or socialist.
1. Why did you block me on your messages. I didn't do anything to you.
2. If there is no proof than I cannot believe you.
It is an estimate based off of how many Christian socialists I know in my city and how many Christian capitalists I know.
Christian Socialists: 47
Christian Capitalists: 29
All together: 86
86 goes into 47 how many times? That will lead you to the percentage of Christian Socialists I know.
86 goes into 29 how many times? That will lead you to the percentage of Christian Capitalists I know.
How did he lie? You lied when you said he called you a rapist.
3]
Old Testament Edit
The Old Testament had divided perspectives on the issue of poverty. One part of the Jewish tradition held that poverty was judgement of God upon the wicked while viewing prosperity as a reward for the good, stating that "The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, but the belly of the wicked suffers want" (Prov. 13:25).[4]
However, there are other sections that instruct generosity to the "have nots" of society. The Torah instructs followers to treat neighbours equally and to be generous to have nots, such as stating:
You shall not oppress your neighbour...but you shall love your neighbour as yourself: I am the Lord
— (Lev 19:13, 18).[5]
He [the Lord your God] executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him food and clothing. Love the sojourner therefore; for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt
— (Deut. 10:18-19).[5]
When you reap in your harvest in the field, and have forgotten a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it...When you beat your olive trees, you shall not go over the boughs again...When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, you shall not glean it afterward; it shall be for the sojourner, the fatherless and the widow. You shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt; therefore I command you to do this
— (Deut. 24:19-22).[5]
Some of the Psalms include many references to social justice for the poor:
Give justice to the weak and the fatherless; maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked
— (Ps. 82 (81): 3, 4).[6]
Blessed is the man who fears the Lord, who greatly delights in his commandments!...He has distributed freely, he has given to the poor; his righteousness endures forever; his horn is exalted in honour
— (Ps. 112 (111): 1, 9).[6]
Amos emphasizes the need for "justice" and "righteousness" that is described as conduct that emphasizes love for those who are poor and to oppose oppression and injustice towards the poor.[7] The prophet Isaiah (759-694 B.C.) to whom is attributed the first thirty-nine chapters of the Book of Isaiah, followed upon Amos' themes of justice and righteousness involving the poor as necessary for followers of God, denouncing those who do not do these things, stating:
Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen; your hands are full of blood...cease to do evil, learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; defend the fatherless, plead for the widow
— (Isa. 1:15-17).[7]
The Book of Sirach, regarded by some as a holy work, but not included in the 39 books of the Old Testament, denounces the pursuit of wealth, stating:
He who loves gold will not be justified, and he who pursues money will be led astray by it. Many have come to ruin because of gold, and their destruction has met them face to face. It is a stumbling block to those who are devoted to it, and every fool will be taken captive by it
— (Sir. 31: 5-7).[8]
The most important quote of the Old Testament that has been recognized by Christian socialists is the verse from Ecclesiastes 3:13 that describes God as promoting an egalitarian society, stating:
It is God's gift to humankind that everyone should eat and drink and take pleasure in all their toil
— (Ecc. 3: 13).[9]
New Testament Edit
In the New Testament, Jesus in Matthew 25:31-46 identifies himself with the hungry, the poor, the sick, and the prisoners.[10] Matthew 25:31-46 is a major component of Christianity and is considered the cornerstone of Christian socialism.[10] Another key statement in the New Testament that is an important component of Christian socialism is Luke 10:25-37 that follows the statement "You shall love your neighbour as yourself" with the question "And who is my neighbour?", and in the Parable of the Good Samaritan Jesus gives the revolutionary response that the neighbour includes anyone in need, even people we might be expected to shun.[11] (The Samaritans were considered a heretical sect by Jews and neither would usually deal with the other.)[11]
Jesus vertreibt die Händler aus dem Tempel by Giovanni Paolo Pannini
In the Sermon on the Plain, Jesus says, "Blessed are you poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you that hunger now, for you shall be satisfied" (Luke 6:20, 21).[12]
Christian socialists note that James the Just, the brother of Jesus of Nazareth, in the Epistle of James criticizes the rich intensely and in strong language:
Come now, you rich, weep and howl for the miseries that are coming upon you. Your riches have rotted and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and silver have rusted, and their rust will be evidence against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have laid up for treasure for the last days. Behold, the wages of the labourers who mowed your fields, which you have kept back by fraud, cry out; and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts. You have lived on the earth in luxury and in pleasure; you have fattened your hearts in a day of slaughter
— (Jam. 5:1-6).[13]
Some of the verses which inspired the communal arrangements of the Anabaptist Hutterites are Acts 2, verses 44 and 45:
"All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need."
Acts 4, verse 32:
"All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of his possessions were his own, but they shared everything they had."
and Acts 4, verses 34 and 35:
"Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need."
So, yes. I say if God existed, the Christian God that is. He would be a socialist. This was copied by a Wikipedia page named Christian socialism.
That is an impossible number to give you. I never said it was 25-75 50-50 or 75-25 I just said it was common.
What claim? Christians can be socialist and it is quite common. Look up Christian socialism.
You can be Christian and Socialist. It is actually quite common.
Then why would you down vote an argument based on only the fact that killing innocents in the name of politics is terrorism?
Instig8or: 3 (and a half) in maturity/8-16
TheCapConKid: 13
GenericName: 25-32
SlapShot: 12-26
Hellno: 23-29
Cartman: 15-23
Saintnow: 43-76
FromWithin: 32-59
Jace: 16-35
Outlaw60: 32-59
Atrag: 18-38
Thanks for the correction.
Let me guess, you are krustyturtle's alt account
If you disagree with the fact that killing people in the name of politics is terrorism that makes you a terrorist.
So you can be trusted. Now answer my question. What is the point in lying?
You told me that neither the points nor the site matters. Lie much?
Ah, so points do matter to you? So you lied in our "private" debate?
What, you think I'm lying about the fact I'm 13 and am secretly 14? Yes, that makes perfect sense.
And since when was being a Virgin an insult? I am proud that I still have my virginity (even though I'm 13, and having sex at this age would land me in the slammer.).
Does that make you a terrorist? Think about it, if you down vote someone who says that killing innocents in the name of politics is terrorism (Which it is) is saying that killing innocents in the name of politics is not terrorism and that means you support the killing of innocents!!! (If you haven't caught on by now, that makes you a terrorist for supporting terrorism)
