CreateDebate


Debate Info

8
9
Yes No
Debate Score:17
Arguments:19
Total Votes:19
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (7)
 
 No (9)

Debate Creator

Vermink(1944) pic



Can using a gun be seen as cowardly?

Yes

Side Score: 8
VS.

No

Side Score: 9
2 points

I say yes only because I don't approve of killing. I think if you want something you should fight for it, and if you are not strong enough to fight, then you should take the initiative to become stronger. Guns allow weak people, physically, and mentally to neglect working on their own strength and instead to use a tool they could buy for pennies to do their dirty work.

Not to mention they are too fast.

If killing is what people want to see, why see it happen in a matter of seconds? Personally I admire the gladiators way of killing, they beat their opponents mercilessly with the strength they acquired, and weapons that only add to their strength.

Side: Yes

So under your scenario, handicapped people are fucked. The way I look at it, brains are better than brawn. And if you are smart enough to use a gun, more power to you ;)

Side: Yes
Quocalimar(6470) Clarified
1 point

Sure brains over brawn in the long run, humanity can't exist on hulking behemoths forever, but in any instance of fairness a gun isn't really fair even if both parties have one. It's all up to who ever sees the other person 1st.

Guns for hunting is a good example of brains over brawn, since we need to eat them but they are physically better than us.

In my former scenario, yes, the handicapped are at a major loss. I am they type of person In real life that believes that we should stop fostering mental illness. I know how people could say it's wrong but I feel like it's more of a suffering to live and have no clue of your surrounding than to never lived at all.

Side: Yes
1 point

It all depends on context in say a duel if your opponent is unarmed or doesnt have a gun then yes it is cowardly and dishonourable if your opponent also has a gun then fair enough. If your say a police officer and you dont know if the people you need to arrest are armed or not then going in to a potentially dangerous situation with your gun drawn is fair enough.

Side: Yes
1 point

Unless your opponent has one, yes. Guns are no fun as weapons anyway.

Side: Yes

I think so. There are plenty of cowards who are using guns to commit violence.

Side: Yes
-1 points

There's a reason why shooting is the number one sport among gay men in North America. Straight men who are secure in their sexuality don't own guns.

Side: Yes
Sitara(11080) Disputed
1 point

prove your theory with a scientific study. Go ahead, I'll wait.

Side: No
1 point

I wouldn't cowardly just not honorable or glorified.

Side: No

So the Palestinians are honorable because they are too stupid to wait until they are strong enough before fighting Israel ;)

Side: No
1 point

I had a hard time choosing which side...

But, I disagree, using guns is just a matter of innovation and a new way to fight the opposition in means of combat. Although, it depends on the situation at hand. Using a rifle in war as to shooting someone because they are much stronger than you are, makes the perspective change by a lot.

Side: No

No. Mostly it varies with a situation. It can be used to install fear or to kill or whatever. It might be like unhonorable to do so sometimes and you know people will say "coward" even though I don't really think thats the best term for it. I just think its not honorable.

Side: No

So the Palestinians are honorable because they are too stupid to wait until they are strong enough before fighting Israel ;)

Side: No
1 point

Its not really cowardly when you are fighting for the survival of yourself.

Side: No
1 point

if someone hurt me or mine's, I would shoot to kill, no doubt.

Side: No