CreateDebate


Debate Info

0
2
More Than 100 Less Than 100
Debate Score:2
Arguments:2
Total Votes:2
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Less Than 100 (2)

Debate Creator

pinnacle19(36) pic



How Many People Must A White Person Blow Up Before They Are Called Terrorists?

Consider the God-fearing white Conservative Christian who has been terrorising Austin with bombs, and who blew himself up before police could catch him.

According to the sheriff involved, that isn't terrorism. It is simply a "challenged young man".

Go figure. And they say white privilege doesn't exist.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/23/mark-anthony-conditt-terrorism-christianity

More Than 100

Side Score: 0
VS.

Less Than 100

Side Score: 2
No arguments found. Add one!
1 point

This is a ridiculous, loaded premise that reveals your purpose in painful detail.

It's purely a question of semantics--the definition of "terrorist" is simply "a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aim." Key word here obviously being "political aim".

IF he had been motivated by a Christian agenda, we could have a different conversation. But until then don't bother posting garbage like this.

Side: Less Than 100

If there are plenty of white terrorists here to go around, why would I support importing foreign terrorists to compound the problem? Just think if these white terrorists thought God would reward them for mass kills. They might start blowing up more airports like foreign terrorists who do believe that. The point? Sure there are home bred terrorists. They usually snap, shoot a few people, and get hauled to jail for being an idiot. Then there are the foreign cultured terrorists who aim a bit higher like hijacking planes and taking down skyscrapers, blowing up airports, blowing up train stations, bombing marathons, running over crowds with big trucks, and mass raping 1,200 women at Cologne Center.

Side: Less Than 100