This is more of a straw-man than an actual criticism. A straw-man in debate is when you attribute beliefs to an opposing side, that they don't actually hold. Like if I said "animal rights activists hate human beings" this would be considered a straw-man.

Hopefully most reasonable people can see this for what it is, political mud-slinging.

If you're really in such political isolation that you can't even tell if something accurately represents the opposing side then you should abstain from these debates, or risk appearing 'ignorant'. I would suggest going to liberal sources to see if this is really what they believe. You'll find it isn't.

Bullshit. You have no clue about what liberalism really means. I am a liberal and I am not like that. Let me ask you a few questions. Have you ever excepted help of any kind from the government, do you drive on public roads, do you ever or have you ever used a public library, have you received healthcare from a public clinic or hospital, etc.? If you answer yes to anyone of these questions, you too have liberal beliefs. Say it loud and say it proud. ;)

The true pillars of liberalism: Religious freedom, political freedom, healthcare freedom, and reproductive freedom. Are you noticing a common theme here? It is FREEDOM.