Is prolife pro-force-women-to-incubate-unwanted-embryo?
proFWTIUE=prolife
Side Score: 17
|
 |
No
Side Score: 9
|
|
|
|
|
3
points
Pro-life is restricting women to only one option and is equal to the government ordering women to keep their pregnancies. Pro-choice is pro-maintaining the already existent laws we have and the choice to keep or abort a pregnancy. Pro-abortion is a bullshit incoherent scare tactic to defame the pro-choice side by making it appear like we favor abortions when actually its usually the opposite however we RESPECT a womans right to her own damn uterus. Side: proFWTIUE=prolife
1
point
3
points
The constitution declares that all powers not delegated to the state or federal government lie with the people and that all rights not contained within the bill of rights are not the only rights people have (9th amendment). Within that are included the natural rights that go without saying that would be part of the Lockean "state of nature" that we wrote about in his 2nd treatise of government which explains that a persons cheif most possession is their own body and their right to control any functions carried out by it. This of course would cover a woman's right to her own uterus and to terminate the process of pregnancy. Its also part of our legislation and was maintained within the court case Roe v Wade. Research is a bitch. Side: proFWTIUE=prolife
3
points
Yes, it does. And it gets worse than that, because at least one jurisdiction that has proposed such legislation (Georgia- general description and link to actual proposed legislation in article) has included with it the necessity of performing investigations into miscarriages that do not occur within a hospital, ostensibly to ensure that it was in fact a miscarriage and not an illegal abortion. My wife and I experienced a miscarriage when we were trying for our first, and it was an incredibly devastating experience. I can only imagine how much more terrible the ordeal would have been were we subjected to investigation under suspicion of having had an illegal abortion. Pro-life legislation has a definite impact on women in general, even those who never had any intent to abort. Side: proFWTIUE=prolife
|
That gives off the impression that random women are randomly being implanted with random embryos, and being forced to hold them. It's more so outlawing the termination of that unwanted embryo that she made the choice to have. She's not really forced to hold it, she just can't kill it. Though I guess since their is nothing else to do with it, holding it is her only option. Side: No
2
points
It's more so outlawing the termination of that unwanted embryo that she made the choice to have. The presence of the embryo does not imply that the woman made the choice to have it there. In cases of contraceptive failure and rape, the woman has actually demonstrated the opposite of consent/intent. Side: proFWTIUE=prolife
1
point
Unless the women is raped, she made choices that resulted in the creation of their unborn child. If women do not want a baby, they need to use contraception or close their legs. For rape victims, the progestin only emergency contraceptive pill is available. There is no reason to kill unborn children unless it is an ectopic pregnancy. Side: No
I agree. We shouldn't call pro-lifers pro-force-women-to-incubate-unwanted- Sitara rules!!! Side: No
1
point
I don't think that is the intention of the pro-life people. I think the intention is to put some of the responsibility for getting pregnant on women. I mean, it's not like a woman goes to the store to get a gallon of milk and "whammo!" all of a sudden... she's pregnant ;) Side: No
1
point
|
