The FASHION industry sucks.
The fashion industry,
which I'm guessing is controlled by gay men,
promote thighs NOT touching:
Straight men,
on the other hand,
promote quite the opposite:
Why would women chose
a gay man's definition of beauty
over
a heterosexual man?
Let hetero men define beauty.
Side Score: 7
|
 |
Let gay men define beauty.
Side Score: 8
|
|
|
|
|
2
points
2
points
If your thighs do not touch, you ass probably looks like this: http://uberhumor.com/wp-content/uploads/
Supporting Evidence:
http://uberhumor.com/wp-content/uploads/
Side: Let hetero men define beauty.
2
points
Women want to impress men (usually men anyways...) right? So wouldn't it be obvious for a heterosexual man to give input on how a woman can look sexy? And vice versa? Besides, the "happy gap" idea (where a person's thighs do not touch) is completely stupid and unhealthy. Stupid because (from what I have read) not having your thighs touch supposedly makes a woman look "sexier". Unhealthy because (you can google this one) many females are now dieting like crazy and becoming anorexic to get their thighs to not touch. Like seriously, who makes this stuff? Side: Let hetero men define beauty.
2
points
Screw it, I'll actually give links. http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/news/thigh-gap http://www.sparksummit.com/2013/06/14/the-thigh-gap-struggle-seeking-perfection-in-the-impossible/ http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/ Side: Let hetero men define beauty.
|
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
It's the clothing they are showing off, not the women. How can they showcase the whole outfit if the woman's voluptuousness devours most of the clothing? Not only that, it puts more focus on the women's body rather than the clothing. They aren't selling women they are selling clothing. Side: Let gay men define beauty.
1
point
1
point
|
