CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
8
Football Rugby
Debate Score:12
Arguments:9
Total Votes:14
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Football (4)
 
 Rugby (5)

Debate Creator

alstars(739) pic



Which is more dangerous sport: Football or Rugby?

Football

Side Score: 4
VS.

Rugby

Side Score: 8
1 point

Instead of kicking the football, if one player , by mistake kicks the other guy's balls, then he is definitely not fit for family making and... you know the consequences!

Side: football
1 point

ummm... I don't understand how kicking somebody in the balls is only exclusive to football and not rugby...

Side: Rugby

I will opine that football is more dangerous because of the possible head injuries involved.

Side: Football
0 points

Rugby players are much more disciplined than footballers. They listen to and respect the referees more. The players also tend to be tougher and can withstand injury. Rugby is a slower paced game so the injuries tend to be less serious.

OMG I had a whole other paragraph when I realised that you meant american football land not the rest of the world football. FFS.

Side: football

Is this honestly a question? Rugby is essentially football for real men. Less pads and less rules. Awesome.

Side: Rugby
2 points

the way they play rugby is crual football is better

Side: Rugby
Flame(52) Disputed
1 point

Footbal came from Rugby. It is an international sport and is football in its purest form.

Side: Rugby
1 point

football is so not dangerous. rugby is so dangerous because people could gat really hurt playing it some guy broke his neck playing rugby before so it should be banned from the world. also people could break their balls.

Side: Rugby
1 point

you kick punch strike and sometimes even pounce upon your opponent that could be too dangerous

Side: Rugby